2017
DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2017.1348044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuity and change in instrumentalizing ‘The Precedent’. How Russia uses Kosovo to legitimize the annexation of Crimea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The book analyzes Russia's practice of normative use of the right to self-determination in the post-Soviet space from the perspectives of sovereignty, secession, and annexation. There are also studies that focus on the path of how Russia legitimized its intervention in the neighboring conflicts from the perspective of normative discourse (Rotaru & Troncotă, 2017). It is argued that Russia's attitude towards the unrecognized entities in question is not based on a denial of sovereignty, but rather on a utilitarian and selective application of the relevant norms (Riegl & Doboš, 2018).…”
Section: The Logic Of Power and Normsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The book analyzes Russia's practice of normative use of the right to self-determination in the post-Soviet space from the perspectives of sovereignty, secession, and annexation. There are also studies that focus on the path of how Russia legitimized its intervention in the neighboring conflicts from the perspective of normative discourse (Rotaru & Troncotă, 2017). It is argued that Russia's attitude towards the unrecognized entities in question is not based on a denial of sovereignty, but rather on a utilitarian and selective application of the relevant norms (Riegl & Doboš, 2018).…”
Section: The Logic Of Power and Normsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Suslov (2014) has drawn attention to the development of two distinctive narratives, the sacralization and the geopolitization of Crimea, which legitimized the annexation. Another central study is Rotaru and Troncotă’s (2017) discussion that the legitimization was based on policy narratives centered around the Kosovo precedent, an argument Putin articulated in his 2014 address. Although such studies add a new dimension in legitimizing the annexation by offering different discursive renditions, there is still a range of discursive elements, which play a central role in understanding the legitimization and which have not been discussed in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing Russian military intervention in Ukraine is illegal in the same meaning as was illegal the NATO intervention against the joint state of Serbia and Montenegro (at that time FR Yugoslavia) in 1999 [46,47].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%