1993
DOI: 10.1017/s0896634600002259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuity and Change in Turkish Culture: Some Critical Remarks on Modern Mahrem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Public space used to be dominated by the male population and although there were certain occasions in which women also participated, they were not a part of public life during the Ottoman period (Arat, 1998;Tokman, 2001). Women were given an active role in the transformation of the society in adopting Western values during the Republican period, and this role was supported by the increasing public appearances of Turkish women (Arat, 1998;Ayata, 1993). Now, a similar role has been undertaken by Islamist women.…”
Section: Reestablishing Turkish Modernity In Public Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Public space used to be dominated by the male population and although there were certain occasions in which women also participated, they were not a part of public life during the Ottoman period (Arat, 1998;Tokman, 2001). Women were given an active role in the transformation of the society in adopting Western values during the Republican period, and this role was supported by the increasing public appearances of Turkish women (Arat, 1998;Ayata, 1993). Now, a similar role has been undertaken by Islamist women.…”
Section: Reestablishing Turkish Modernity In Public Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bora (1996, page 194) states that the``ethocentric nationalism'' emphasized cultural identity through Turkish citizenship, leading to a``xenophobic attitude towards the rest of the world''. Religious identity was also suppressed by national identity (Ayata, 1993;Robins, 1996). Robins (1996, page 71) claims that the authoritarian state``has continuously denied the real diversity of civil society, which it can only comprehend in terms of social fragmentation, and against which it has mobilized the idealized fantasy of the Turkish people-as-one''.…”
Section: Reestablishing Turkish Modernity In Public Lifementioning
confidence: 99%