Continuity, Engagement and Integration: Early Intervention in Remote Australian Aboriginal Communities

Robinson, Gary; Mares, Sarah; Arney, Fiona

doi:10.1080/0312407x.2016.1146315

Cited by 29 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The sixth was an Australian study on how a randomized controlled trial developed an inclusive methodological approach co‐designed by people affected by severe mental illness . The seventh was a regional Australian study on engaging families in the design of child protection measures . The eight study was from the UK that explored differences between what seldom heard groups prioritize in health from mainstream views …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The review found that engagement with seldom heard groups needs to occur in safe, accessible and inclusive spaces . Ensuring spaces are accessible needs to be guaranteed by undertaking an audit at the start of the research, which should be monitored and reviewed throughout the project .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Kaiser study identified the importance of allocating funding to celebrate success with community partners . Including funding to cover the cost of involvement emerged as a mechanism in most of the literature . DFI stressed that this was key as often it was expected that they as an organization should cover these costs.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…DFI stressed that this was key as often it was expected that they as an organization should cover these costs. Providing resources for the development of a research partnership emerged significantly in Robinson et al, who also emphasized the need to be present to develop trust.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Clarifying the mechanisms and resources that enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups in health and social care research: A collaborative rapid realist review process

Shé

Morton

Lambert

et al. 2019

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Public and patient involvement is increasingly embedded as a core activity in research funding calls and best practice guidelines. However, there is recognition of the challenges that prevail to achieve genuine and equitable forms of engagement. Our objective was to identify the mechanisms and resources that enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups in health and social care research. Methods A rapid realist review of the literature that included: (a) a systematic search of CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed and Open Grey (2007‐2017); (b) documents provided by expert panel members of relevant journals and grey literature. Six reference panels were undertaken with homeless, women's, transgender, disability and Traveller and Roma organizations to capture local insights. Data were extracted into a theory‐based grid linking context to behaviour change policy categories. Main results From the review, 20 documents were identified and combined with the reference panel summaries. The expert panel reached consensus about 33 programme theories. These relate to environmental and social planning (7); service provision (6); guidelines (4); fiscal measures (6); communication and marketing (4); and regulation and legislation (6). Conclusions While there is growing evidence of the merits of undertaking PPI, this rarely extends to the meaningful involvement of seldom heard groups. The 33 programme theories agreed by the expert panel point to a variety of mechanisms and resources that need to be considered. Many of the programme theories identified point to the need for a radical shift in current practice to enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Clarifying the mechanisms and resources that enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups in health and social care research: A collaborative rapid realist review process

Shé

Morton

Lambert

et al. 2019

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The demands of providing remote area health, welfare and other professional services include high visibility and trying to 'fit in' , managing confidentiality, and dual and inter-relationships. These and other geographical and environmental challenges lead to low workforce retention rates that, in turn, leave significant gaps in service provision for children, families and communities, including Aboriginal communities (Jervis-Tracey et al, 2016;Lehmann, 2015;Robinson, Mares, & Arney, 2016).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Editorial

Gair¹,

Lehmann²,

Sanders³

2016

Children Australia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Welcome to the final edition of Children Australia for 2016. For this edition, I am pleased to be guest co-editor along with regular editors Jennifer Lehmann and Rachael Sanders. Living in rural and remote Australia can bring a high level of satisfaction and many rewards, including a strong caring community, rich, longstanding social relationships, outdoor lifestyle, happy childhood memories and psychological, cultural, spiritual and economic connections to country. Rural living and working can also bring unique challenges including harsh climatic conditions and crises, a tyranny of distance, isolation, family hardships, limited services and infrastructure, reduced education and employment opportunities; and increased risk of mental health issues, family violence and child safety concerns. The demands of providing remote area health, welfare and other professional services include high visibility and trying to ‘fit in’, managing confidentiality, and dual and inter-relationships. These and other geographical and environmental challenges lead to low workforce retention rates that, in turn, leave significant gaps in service provision for children, families and communities, including Aboriginal communities (Jervis-Tracey et al., 2016; Lehmann, 2015; Robinson, Mares, & Arney, 2016).

show abstract

Family-centred interventions for Indigenous early childhood well-being by primary healthcare services

Strobel

Chamberlain

Campbell

et al. 2022

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Continuity, Engagement and Integration: Early Intervention in Remote Australian Aboriginal Communities

Cited by 29 publications

References 14 publications

Clarifying the mechanisms and resources that enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups in health and social care research: A collaborative rapid realist review process

Clarifying the mechanisms and resources that enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups in health and social care research: A collaborative rapid realist review process

Editorial

Family-centred interventions for Indigenous early childhood well-being by primary healthcare services

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About