1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00370035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuity requirements for density functions in the boundary integral equation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these definitions have analogues for one-dimensional finite-part integrals. For more information on hypersingular integrals over surfaces, see Martin & Rizzo (1989, 1996, Krishnasamy et al (1990) and Krishnasamy, Rizzo & Rudolphi (1992).…”
Section: Appendix a Two-dimensional Finite-part Integralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these definitions have analogues for one-dimensional finite-part integrals. For more information on hypersingular integrals over surfaces, see Martin & Rizzo (1989, 1996, Krishnasamy et al (1990) and Krishnasamy, Rizzo & Rudolphi (1992).…”
Section: Appendix a Two-dimensional Finite-part Integralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the very successful numerical results reported by Richardson et al (1997), Richardson and Cruse (1999), Chien et al (1991), Huang and Cruse (1994) using various forms of these relaxed algorithms combined with piece-wise C 1,α interpolations, Martin and Rizzo (1996), Krishnasamy et al (1992) have concluded that these algorithms could not be theoretically justified. This means that, from a strictly mathematical point of view, only boundary element implementations that ensure C 0,α or C 1,α continuity at each collocation point can be applied in the discretizations of the standard, or the hypersingular boundary integral equations, respectively.…”
Section: Paper Accepted April 2009 Technical Editor: Nestor a Zouamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nevertheless, the higherorder of the singularities in the kernels requires more smoothness of the densities for the given integral to be finite, just like on the standard hypersingular formulation. According to Krishnasamy et al (1992), a sufficient condition for the existence of the hypersingular integral is the C 1,α continuity of the density function at the source point. Standard isoparametric boundary elements do not satisfy this requirement and for this reason, approximate solution techniques for solving hypersingular integral equations by means of the BEM require special consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final form of the modified boundary integral equation based on Chien's method of hypersingular regularization [5] as: is termed as the density function. For the finite part (FP) of the hypersingular integral in Term A to exist, it is important that the density function is C 1 continuous at the interelement edges [7]. It should be noted that when using constant elements to describe the pressure function variation, Term A in (Eq.12) is zero since the field point is collocated at the same point where the source point lies (i.e.…”
Section: Axisymmetric Hypersingular Boundary Element Formulation For mentioning
confidence: 99%