2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000266590.25109.f2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous cardiac output monitoring via arterial pressure waveform analysis following severe hemorrhagic shock in dogs*

Abstract: PulseCO determination of cardiac output does not accurately predict rapid decreases in cardiac output or the effects of fluid resuscitation in dogs. Recalibration of PulseCO may be necessary after any apparent or suspected decrease in cardiac preload, afterload, or contractility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data has subsequently been confirmed by Costa et al in patients after liver transplantation [11]. In contrast, Cooper and Muir observed a much worse correlation with a huge percentage error (r = )0.45, 98%) between lithium dilution and LiDCO during severe haemorrhagic shock and after fluid resuscitation in dogs [21]. Their results showed a wide range of limits of agreement and they concluded that LiDCO did not accurately predict rapid decreases in cardiac output or the effects of fluid resuscitation in dogs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…These data has subsequently been confirmed by Costa et al in patients after liver transplantation [11]. In contrast, Cooper and Muir observed a much worse correlation with a huge percentage error (r = )0.45, 98%) between lithium dilution and LiDCO during severe haemorrhagic shock and after fluid resuscitation in dogs [21]. Their results showed a wide range of limits of agreement and they concluded that LiDCO did not accurately predict rapid decreases in cardiac output or the effects of fluid resuscitation in dogs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It was this latter pattern of change that we observed with epidural and general anaesthesia. In studies looking at haemodynamic instability secondary to haemorrhage, the LiDCOplus system appears to overestimate cardiac output [17]. We observed this pattern on aortic clamping.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The majority of experimental [59][60][61] and clinical [62][63][64][65] data suggests that calibration of arterial waveform analyzers improves accuracy, although this finding is not universal. 64,[66][67][68] The accuracy of these devices generally decreases during periods of hemodynamic instability; 59,60,64,[69][70][71] thus, there appears to be a tradeoff between convenience and reliability, especially in situations in which loading conditions are expected to change.…”
Section: Technological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64,[66][67][68] The accuracy of these devices generally decreases during periods of hemodynamic instability; 59,60,64,[69][70][71] thus, there appears to be a tradeoff between convenience and reliability, especially in situations in which loading conditions are expected to change.…”
Section: Technological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%