2009
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00389-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Cefazolin Infusion To Treat Bone and Joint Infections: Clinical Efficacy, Feasibility, Safety, and Serum and Bone Concentrations

Abstract: Cefazolin has been used for many years to treat bone and joint infections. Because of its time-dependent antimicrobial activity, continuous infusion would potentially be beneficial. We report on the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of prolonged continuous intravenous cefazolin therapy in a cohort of 100 patients, their serum cefazolin levels, and the concomitant bone cefazolin concentrations in 8 of them. This retrospective cohort study included all the patients treated for bone or joint infection with a cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
41
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we did not confirm biofilm formation on the prosthesis before the electrical stimulation protocol and it is recognized that clinically IAI might appear at a time later than POD 6 when more robust biofilms might be present. However, the results suggest antibiotic therapy alone did not effectively treat the implant bacterial burden in this model, which is consistent with biofilm-associated orthopaedic infections seen clinically [26]. We also must point out that the undetectable CFU levels presented in this study may not necessarily mean the infection was eradicated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Second, we did not confirm biofilm formation on the prosthesis before the electrical stimulation protocol and it is recognized that clinically IAI might appear at a time later than POD 6 when more robust biofilms might be present. However, the results suggest antibiotic therapy alone did not effectively treat the implant bacterial burden in this model, which is consistent with biofilm-associated orthopaedic infections seen clinically [26]. We also must point out that the undetectable CFU levels presented in this study may not necessarily mean the infection was eradicated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Vancomycin was given as a high-dose continuous infusion, with target serum concentrations of 30 to 40 mg/liter, as previously described (18). Cefazolin (19), ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and clindamycin (20) were also administered via continuous infusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 47 patients, a second sample was obtained between days 8 and 28, with a minimum of 5 days between the times of collection of the two samples. Samples were assayed as described before (30). Multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus SJ11617 (rifampin MIC, Ͼ128 mg/liter; fosfomycin MIC, Ͼ512 mg/liter; fluoroquinolone MICs, Ͼ64 mg/liter; fusidic acid MIC, Ͼ256 mg/liter) was used as the indicator organism.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%