Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a common and morbid complication of mechanical ventilation. Notwithstanding hospitals' and device manufacturers' extensive efforts to prevent this condition, clinical audits suggest VAP rates have changed little over the past decade [1]. VAP's persistence compels us to redouble our efforts to find better ways to prevent this condition. Prevention efforts to date can be divided into two major domains: (1) technical innovations to reduce biofilm accumulation and passage of secretions around the endotracheal tube cuff, and (2) adaptive work to minimize duration of mechanical ventilation and thus time at risk for VAP. Examples of technical innovations include antiseptic-coatings, subglottic secretion drainage, tracheal cuff pressure maintenance systems, and novel endotracheal tube cuff designs. Examples of adaptive efforts include minimizing sedation, increasing the use of spontaneous awakening and spontaneous breathing trials, and early mobilization programs.Technical innovations have followed a familiar pattern. Initially promising bench studies have given way to disappointing clinical trials [2]. Antiseptic coating decreased endotracheal tube colonization rates in sheep but did not decrease duration of mechanical ventilation or mortality rates in humans [3,4]. Subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) reduces VAP diagnoses but does not reduce time to extubation or mortality rates [5]. Persistently low tracheal cuff pressures are a risk factor for VAP but automated cuff pressure control devices have yielded conflicting results [6,7]. Tapered and polyurethane cuffs decrease (but do not eliminate) leakage around the cuff in bench studies but have not reduced VAP rates in randomized controlled trials [8,9].A recent article by Jaillette and colleagues in Intensive Care Medicine continues this disappointing pattern [10]. The investigators compared conical polyvinylchloride cuffs to standard-shaped cuffs on aspiration rates, VAP, and ventilator-associated events (VAE), and assayed endotracheal tube aspirates for pepsin and alpha-amylase. Pepsin was considered a surrogate marker for aspirating gastric fluids and alpha-amylase a surrogate marker for aspirating oropharyngeal fluids. The investigators found no difference in the frequency of positive pepsin assays (54% of tapered cuff samples vs 51% of standard cuff samples) or positive alpha-amylase assays (77 vs 69%). Likewise, there were no differences in VAP or VAE rates, ventilator-free days, ICU length-of-stay, or ICU mortality. This multicenter, cluster, randomized cross-over trial has a number of strengths. The primary outcome was positive pepsin assays, but to their credit the authors also reported on VAP, VAE, ventilator-free days, ICU lengthof-stay, and ICU mortality. Including these secondary outcomes provides useful clinical context to interpret the pepsin and alpha-amylase assays, especially since they are imperfect markers for aspiration [11].A number of important observations and questions arise from the study. First, i...