1966
DOI: 10.1063/1.1704885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Degenerate Representations of Noncompact Rotation Groups. II

Abstract: Three principal continuous series of most degenerate unitary irreducible representations of an arbitrary noncompact rotation group SO(p, q) have been derived and their properties discussed in detail. The corresponding harmonic functions have been constructed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrete series then corresponds to special values of the mass in this range where a subset of the modes display the convergent h + behavior at both I ± -see Appendix A and refs. [24,25,26,27]. However, we emphasize that even in these special cases, the full space of solutions still includes modes diverging at both asymptotic boundaries.…”
Section: Some Ds/cft Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The discrete series then corresponds to special values of the mass in this range where a subset of the modes display the convergent h + behavior at both I ± -see Appendix A and refs. [24,25,26,27]. However, we emphasize that even in these special cases, the full space of solutions still includes modes diverging at both asymptotic boundaries.…”
Section: Some Ds/cft Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three regimes also appear in discussions in the mathematics literature -see, e.g., [24,25,26,27]. There the scalar field is classified according to M 2 regarded as its SO(n + 1, 1) Casimir.…”
Section: Some Ds/cft Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Lie algebra so (p, q) of SO(p, q) may then be defined as the set of real (p + q) x (p + q) matrices a such that tr a = 0 and ag+ga=0 (1.1) Even in two closely related problems it can happen that the so (p, q) basis is the most useful for one problem while the canonical basis is the most convenient for the other. For example, the recent determination of the maximal solvable subgroups of SO(p, q) by Patera, Winternitz & Zassenhaus (1974) employs the so(p, q) basis, while for embeddings of SO(p, q) with other semi-simple Lie groups (Cornwell, 1971a(Cornwell, , 1971bEkins & Comwell, 1974a, 1974b, 1974c) the canonical basis is the most convenient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operator −F on L 2 (H 4 + ) coincides with the Laplace operator ∆(H 4 + ) in the corresponding coordinate system (see [37]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%