2015 Proceedings of the Conference on Control and Its Applications 2015
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611974072.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous-Discrete Observers for Time-Varying Nonlinear Systems: A Tutorial on Recent Results

Abstract: Continuous-discrete systems can occur when the plant state evolves in continuous time but the output values are only available at discrete instants. Continuous-discrete observers have the valuable property that the observation error between the true state of the system and the observer state converges to zero in a uniform way. The design of continuousdiscrete observers can often be done by building framers, which provide componentwise upper and lower bounds for the plant state. This paper is a tutorial on thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See also Ahmed-Ali et al (2013b); Farza et al (2013); Karafyllis and Kravaris (2009) for observers based on output predictors and Andrieu and Nadri (2010); Deza et al (1992); Hammouri et al (2006); Dinh (2013, 2014); Tellez-Anguiano et al (2012); Karafyllis and Kravaris (2012); and see Ahmed-Ali et al (2013a), which presents results that allow delayed and sampled measurements. The work Ahmed-Ali et al (2009) builds continuous-discrete observers for nonlinear systems, where the input acts on the system to satisfy a persistent excitation condition, while Nadri and Hammouri (2003) covers systems with known inputs and which are linear in the state. The work Karafyllis and Kravaris (2009) shows that if a system admits a suitable continuous time observer and the observer satisfies certain robustness properties, then one can augment the observer by a new output predictor system to produce a continuous-discrete observer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See also Ahmed-Ali et al (2013b); Farza et al (2013); Karafyllis and Kravaris (2009) for observers based on output predictors and Andrieu and Nadri (2010); Deza et al (1992); Hammouri et al (2006); Dinh (2013, 2014); Tellez-Anguiano et al (2012); Karafyllis and Kravaris (2012); and see Ahmed-Ali et al (2013a), which presents results that allow delayed and sampled measurements. The work Ahmed-Ali et al (2009) builds continuous-discrete observers for nonlinear systems, where the input acts on the system to satisfy a persistent excitation condition, while Nadri and Hammouri (2003) covers systems with known inputs and which are linear in the state. The work Karafyllis and Kravaris (2009) shows that if a system admits a suitable continuous time observer and the observer satisfies certain robustness properties, then one can augment the observer by a new output predictor system to produce a continuous-discrete observer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because time scales theory allows a mathematical description of continuous-discrete hybrid processes using more general dynamical equations within a unified framework, rather than unilaterally using difference or differential equations. • A conventional approach to solving the problem is the continuous-discrete Kalman filter, which consists of continuous-time state prediction and discrete-time state update [27], [28]. Yet, the limitation of this approach is that the discrete output must be uniformly sampled (i.e., with a fixed step size), which is often not the case for realistic intermittent OWC systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the implemented input is, for almost every time, different from the designed controller. Several methods have been developed in the literature of ordinary differential equations for sampled-data observer design under discrete-time measurements (see, e.g., [2,19,24,29]), and for sampled-data control design guaranteeing a globally stable closed-loop system (see, e.g., [1,13]). Apart from time-delays systems (see, e.g., [7,20,39] for sampled-data control and [29,30] for sampled-data observer design), few results exist for infinite-dimensional systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been developed in the literature of ordinary differential equations for sampled-data observer design under discrete-time measurements (see, e.g., [2,19,24,29]), and for sampled-data control design guaranteeing a globally stable closed-loop system (see, e.g., [1,13]). Apart from time-delays systems (see, e.g., [7,20,39] for sampled-data control and [29,30] for sampled-data observer design), few results exist for infinite-dimensional systems. The difficulties come from the fact that the developed methods do not directly apply to the infinite-dimensional case, for which even the well-posedness of sampled-data control dynamics is not obvious (see, e.g., [21] for more details).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%