2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous glucose monitoring is more sensitive than HbA1c and fasting glucose in detecting dysglycaemia in a Spanish population without diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from healthy individuals without diabetes could help identify thresholds that signify impaired glycemic status in those at risk for diabetes and set the standard for CGM metrics that should be sought in the development of future pharmacologic agents and technologic improvements. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] However, there are limited data on CGM-measured glucose concentrations in individuals without diabetes. Most studies of CGM profiles in healthy individuals without diabetes have had small sample sizes or used early generation CGM systems, which were less accurate than the current devices, and rarely explored important factors, such as meals and physical activity, that could impact glycemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from healthy individuals without diabetes could help identify thresholds that signify impaired glycemic status in those at risk for diabetes and set the standard for CGM metrics that should be sought in the development of future pharmacologic agents and technologic improvements. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] However, there are limited data on CGM-measured glucose concentrations in individuals without diabetes. Most studies of CGM profiles in healthy individuals without diabetes have had small sample sizes or used early generation CGM systems, which were less accurate than the current devices, and rarely explored important factors, such as meals and physical activity, that could impact glycemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of the impact of aging on glucose curves is essential for identifying those affected, determining the mechanisms behind the CGM is an accurate technology that provides more information than conventional measurement systems [14][15]. Although CGM is mainly used for individuals with diabetes, recent studies have shown that CGM is a useful, reliable, and accurate diagnostic tool for studying glycemic behavior in populations without diabetes [3,10]. Recent studies have shown the need for using other types of glycemic measurements, such as time in range, which is strongly associated with the risk of microvascular complications and should be an acceptable endpoint for clinical trials [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current knowledge on normoglycemia is largely based on studies with populations without diabetes [17][18][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], in which the progression of glucose profiles has not been studied, resulting in a limited understanding of the real-life blood glucose patterns of healthy individuals. Determining how long normoglycemic individuals spend at different blood glucose levels in real-life conditions and the progression of those levels over time is a necessary step in establishing reference points for more detailed studies of altered glycemic states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, Rodriguez-Segade et al have shown that the use of CGM can better detect dysglycemia in persons without diabetes. 41 In one study, CGM was used to identify children at risk for T1D as well. 42 In these cases, short-term use or intermittent use of CGM can be meaningful and makes a good diagnostic tool.…”
Section: Possible Situations/indications For Intermittent Cgm Usagementioning
confidence: 99%