2022
DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvac060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles in Healthy, Nondiabetic Young Children

Abstract: Context Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly being used for both day-to-day management in patients with diabetes and in clinical research. While data on glycemic profiles of healthy, non-diabetic individuals exists, data on non-diabetic very young children are lacking. Objective To establish reference sensor glucose ranges in healthy, non-diabetic young children, using a current generation CGM sensor. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, this study has limitations that are worth mentioning; the first one being that the small sample size was due to the drop-out during the 6 years of follow-up, and the lack of availability of more data, due to not all parents that came to the 6 years old follow-up visit with their children wanting them to wear the 24 h CGM device. However, most of the few studies carried out in non-diabetic young children have a smaller sample size compared to our study [ 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Nevertheless, this study has limitations that are worth mentioning; the first one being that the small sample size was due to the drop-out during the 6 years of follow-up, and the lack of availability of more data, due to not all parents that came to the 6 years old follow-up visit with their children wanting them to wear the 24 h CGM device. However, most of the few studies carried out in non-diabetic young children have a smaller sample size compared to our study [ 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Our data also suggest that children and adolescents with GSDIa spend a longer time in hypoglycemia (median percentage of time with sensor readings <3.9 mmol/L: children, 3.7%; adolescents, 2.7%) compared with healthy young children aged 1-6 years (0.4%). 29 However, we should be cautious when comparing data among studies due to differences in study design, patient characteristics, and the treatments for GSDIa, among other factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also calculated additional CGM parameters, including the overall glucose distribution, percentage of sensor values within set ranges, number of patients with ≥1 hypoglycemic event, and duration of hypoglycemic events for patients with ≥1 event, as used in studies by Peeks et al 22 and DuBose et al 29 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown that for patients with chronic CNS damage who are tube-fed, hypoglycaemia can be a significant clinical problem. In our patients, the median TUR 70 amounted to 1.32 (0.39–3.03)%, and hypoglycaemia alarm events were detected in as many as 15 out of the 19 patients (79%), including two who experienced clinically significant decreases in glucose concentrations (TUR 54: 11% and 2.74%, respectively; Table 3 ) In healthy subjects, the percentage of time spent with glycaemia <70 mg% was estimated to be at the level of 0.4% (corresponding to 6 min/day) in children 1–6 years old and 1.1% (15 min/day) in the older population (7–80 years); at least one episode of hypoglycaemia occurred in 23% and 28% of the subjects in these groups, respectively [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%