2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--36848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Improvement in Academic Computing Programs is Rarely Comprehensive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The integration problem lies at the heart of the continuous improvement (CI) requirement. Azzouni et al (2021) [19] conducted an extensive literature search on this topic, particularly in the academic accreditation setting. They note that CI can be analyzed and implemented in two ways, either as a system or a process with the ABET student outcomes criteria (SOs 1 thru 7) "…identify(ing) the major components..." CI data inputs can be either quantitative, qualitative, or both.…”
Section: Program Design and Continuous Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration problem lies at the heart of the continuous improvement (CI) requirement. Azzouni et al (2021) [19] conducted an extensive literature search on this topic, particularly in the academic accreditation setting. They note that CI can be analyzed and implemented in two ways, either as a system or a process with the ABET student outcomes criteria (SOs 1 thru 7) "…identify(ing) the major components..." CI data inputs can be either quantitative, qualitative, or both.…”
Section: Program Design and Continuous Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%