2010
DOI: 10.2178/jsl/1278682208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous isomorphisms fromRonto a complete abelian group

Abstract: This paper provides a Bishop-style constructive analysis of the contrapositive of the statement that a continuous homomorphism of R onto a compact abelian group is periodic. It is shown that, subject to a weak locatedness hypothesis, if G is a complete (metric) abelian group that is the range of a continuous isomorphism from R, then G is noncompact. A special case occurs when G satisfies a certain local path-connectedness condition at 0. A number of results about one-one and injective mappings are proved en ro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A concluding comment: our investigation of continuous group homomorphisms arose from Arno Berger asking whether the Baire category theorem was essential for the proof of COP, whose (partial) abstraction to the context of abelian groups we have analysed constructively in this paper and [7]. We still do not know the answer to Berger's question, but it is interesting that the proof of our direct constructive analogue of the (abstracted) periodicity theorem uses the "dense open sets" version of Baire's theorem, whereas our proof of a contrapositive version, in [7], uses a constructively inequivalent "union of closed sets" version.…”
Section: Wlpomentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A concluding comment: our investigation of continuous group homomorphisms arose from Arno Berger asking whether the Baire category theorem was essential for the proof of COP, whose (partial) abstraction to the context of abelian groups we have analysed constructively in this paper and [7]. We still do not know the answer to Berger's question, but it is interesting that the proof of our direct constructive analogue of the (abstracted) periodicity theorem uses the "dense open sets" version of Baire's theorem, whereas our proof of a contrapositive version, in [7], uses a constructively inequivalent "union of closed sets" version.…”
Section: Wlpomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We still do not know the answer to Berger's question, but it is interesting that the proof of our direct constructive analogue of the (abstracted) periodicity theorem uses the "dense open sets" version of Baire's theorem, whereas our proof of a contrapositive version, in [7], uses a constructively inequivalent "union of closed sets" version.…”
Section: Wlpomentioning
confidence: 99%