2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous measurement of suspended sediment concentration: Technological advancement and future outlook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Figure 2C and D, the SSC of the Conceição and Guaporé catchments was similar and the turbidity was greater in the Conceição. Despite the difference found in the particle size carried in suspension, it is unlikely that it affected the scattering of light emitted by the sensor (Rai & Kumar, 2015). Other interfering factors not accounted for in this study may have caused the difference found, for example, color and mineralogy of the soil from each catchment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the Figure 2C and D, the SSC of the Conceição and Guaporé catchments was similar and the turbidity was greater in the Conceição. Despite the difference found in the particle size carried in suspension, it is unlikely that it affected the scattering of light emitted by the sensor (Rai & Kumar, 2015). Other interfering factors not accounted for in this study may have caused the difference found, for example, color and mineralogy of the soil from each catchment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The relationship between turbidity and SSC depends on the different characteristics of suspended sediment, such as grain size (Merten et al, 2014), color, and mineralogy of the sediments (Rai & Kumar, 2015). The particle size in transport varies with the hydraulic characteristics of the flow, erosive processes, geomorphological and lithological conditions of the catchment, and presence of vegetation (Slattery & Burt, 1997;Lenzi & Marchi, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitation of ADCP in observing different grain sizes of suspended sediment has been described previously by researcher (e.g., [5]). The ADCP instrument was unable to distinguish between large particle sizes and small particle sizes that accumulate in particular volume in this research, so the measurement using ADCP will be slightly lower in estimating the suspended sediment concentration [26].…”
Section: Comparison Between Adcp-based Ssc and Laboratorybased Sscmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, this method is also relatively expensive and takes a long time of measurement process and sampling at all observation site, as well as optical method using laser in situ scattering and transmissometry [4]. To overcome this problem, the application of underwater acoustic technologies is used to quantify SSC, which can provide continuous and large coverage in greater detail of SSC data [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly, a paucity of high-frequency and long-term SSC or other proxy data (e.g., turbidity) necessitate the assumption that suspended sediment yield per unit discharge is static (Gray et al, 2003;Jones, Stevens, Horsburgh, & Mesner, 2011). However, as these records continue to grow and more frequent measurements become possible with advanced technologies (Gray & Gartner, 2009;Rai & Kumar, 2015), there is a growing body of evidence that the yield of suspended sediment per unit discharge varies over a wide range of time scales, from individual storms (Bača, 2008;Gellis, 2013) to interannual timeframes (Herndon et al, 2015;Rodríguez-Blanco, Taboada-Castro, & Taboada-Castro, 2010;Warrick, 2015). These changes manifest as variations in the rating curve over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%