2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2017.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous millennial decrease of the Earth’s magnetic axial dipole

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main consequences is the poor knowledge of dipole moment variation prior to 1840. Models disagree when to know if the dipole moment decreased regularly since~750 CE (Poletti et al, 2018) or since~1700 CE after seven centuries of stability (Hellio & Gillet, 2018). The lack of data also prevents a precise understanding of geomagnetic anomalies at the Earth's surface such as the present South Atlantic anomaly (e.g., Campuzano et al, 2019;Terra-Nova et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main consequences is the poor knowledge of dipole moment variation prior to 1840. Models disagree when to know if the dipole moment decreased regularly since~750 CE (Poletti et al, 2018) or since~1700 CE after seven centuries of stability (Hellio & Gillet, 2018). The lack of data also prevents a precise understanding of geomagnetic anomalies at the Earth's surface such as the present South Atlantic anomaly (e.g., Campuzano et al, 2019;Terra-Nova et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending the record using paleomagnetic observations offers insights, but the message is not always clear. Paleomagnetic intensity measurements support a lower rate of decline over the past 1 kyr (Poletti et al, ), but there are several instances in the past 7 kyr when larger trends did not persist for long enough to cause a reversal (Constable & Korte, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geomagnetic records at the scale of billions to millions of years were fundamental to demonstrate the tectonic movements of lithospheric plates, providing a means for quantitatively assess the dynamic configuration of the upper layers of the planet (e.g., Pesonen et al, 2003;Kono, 2010). On the other hand, the geomagnetic record at the scale of thousands of years to years (and less) is the way to probe the geodynamic processes acting at the deepest layers of the Earth, at the core and its neighborhood, including heat-flow changes at the core-mantle boundary, movements of the conductive fluid in the outer core, and interactions between the inner and outer cores, and the lower mantle (e.g., Kono, 2010;Aubert et al, 2013;Finlay et al, 2016;Poletti et al, 2018).…”
Section: ____________________________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is some speculation about the origin of the geomagnetic jerks (e.g., Bloxham et al, 2002;Mandea et al, 2010;Demetrescu and Dobrica, 2014;Feng et al, 2018) its physical mechanism is still not fully understood. Centennial to millennial variations are investigated through records of geological and archaeological materials, and are essential to understand most of the operant physical mechanisms in the outer core at these timescales (e.g., Brown et al, 2015;Constable et al, 2006;Poletti et al, 2018), as well as physical interactions between the mantle and the core (e.g., Tarduno et al, 2015, Terra-…”
Section: ____________________________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation