1972
DOI: 10.1093/bja/44.7.667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Positive Pressure Ventilation and Oxygen Delivery

Abstract: The effects of intermittent and continuous positive pressure were studied in mechanically ventilated healthy dogs. No statistically significant changes were produced in oxygen tension, carbon dioxide tension, alveolar-arterial gradients or shunts by continuous positive pressure. It did produce a significant reduction in cardiac output and total oxygen delivery which was reversed by the reintroduction of intermittent positive pressure. The decline in cardiac output was not accompanied by hypotension. The applic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1974
1974
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PEEP is known as a two-edged sword because of its potential negative effect on venous return and cardiac output. Total oxygen delivery to the tissues may be reduced in spite of increased arterial Poz (PHILBIN et al 1972). However, only a moderate increase in central venous pressure was observed in the present study.…”
Section: Cppv and Peepcontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…PEEP is known as a two-edged sword because of its potential negative effect on venous return and cardiac output. Total oxygen delivery to the tissues may be reduced in spite of increased arterial Poz (PHILBIN et al 1972). However, only a moderate increase in central venous pressure was observed in the present study.…”
Section: Cppv and Peepcontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…It has long been known that IPPV diminishes cardiac output (COURNAND et al 1948). PEEP may further enhance such an effect and actually diminish the amount of delivered oxygen in spite of an increased Paoz (PHILBIN et al 1972, LUTCH & MURRAY 1972, KING et al 1973. Positive end-expiratory pressure must therefore be used with caution and not indiscriminately applied to all patients on respirator treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( I967), numerous reports have documented the value of the method (UZAWA & ASHBAUGH 1969, MCINTYRE et al 1969, KUMAR et al 1970, SUGERMAN et al 1972, especially in patients with interstitial pulmonary oedema, acute chest trauma and similar conditions associated with an impaired ventilation/perfusion ratio. It also is evident from the literature that even if arterial oxygen tension may be improved, this does not necessarily imply an improvement in overall oxygen delivery (LUTCH & MURRAY 1972, PHILBIN et al 1972. The application of PEEP to patients after cardiac surgery merits special attention in this respect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%