2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-009-9197-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Refractory Intracranial Hypertension

Abstract: Though unproven, CRRT may be beneficial in patients with IH due to gentle removal of fluid, solutes, and inflammatory cytokines. Given the limited data on safety of CRRT in patients with ABI, we encourage further reports.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among treatment modalities for ARF, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has shown to have a much lesser effect on intracranial pressure (ICP) than intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) 6). Additionally, some authors have reported that CRRT have an effect on lowering ICP 89). Regarding hemodynamics, CRRT can be a better treatment modality for ARF compared to IHD in severe TBI patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among treatment modalities for ARF, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has shown to have a much lesser effect on intracranial pressure (ICP) than intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) 6). Additionally, some authors have reported that CRRT have an effect on lowering ICP 89). Regarding hemodynamics, CRRT can be a better treatment modality for ARF compared to IHD in severe TBI patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential protective strategies against DDS have been proposed in the literature, including slower blood and dialysate flows, smaller surface area dialyzer membranes, and high sodium and low bicarbonate concentrations in the dialysate [14]. Furthermore, continuous therapies (i.e., CRRT) have been suggested as being safer than intermittent hemodialysis in patients at risk of DDS [15, 16]. The common rationale behind these strategies is to slow down the rate of urea clearance, to reduce the change in serum osmolality, and to maintain hemodynamic stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(32,33) Additionally, there is anecdotal evidence that CRRT may have beneficial effects in patients with refractory intracranial hypertension. (34) The disadvantage of any CRRT is the use of anticoagulation, wherein there are risks of intracerebral hemorrhage. However, we did not employ anticoagulants in the presented cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%