2014
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous sequential boundaries for vaccine safety surveillance

Abstract: Various recently developed sequential methods have been used to detect signals for post-marketing surveillance in drug and vaccine safety. Among these, the maximized sequential probability ratio test (MaxSPRT) has been used to detect elevated risks of adverse events following vaccination using large healthcare databases. However, a limitation of MaxSPRT is that it only provides a time-invariant flat boundary. In this study, we propose the use of time-varying boundaries for controlling how type I error is distr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming N is the maximum surveillance length in terms of expected number of cases, the stopping boundary, T , for the continuous MaxSPRT is T=min(T^,N), where T^=inft>0:ln(Λ)>=B(t), which is the time we reject H 0 . B ( t ) is a function of time t , which can be a time‐invariant flat constant proposed in the original MaxSPRT paper or a time‐varying boundary, which changes over time . For a group sequential method, the stopping boundary can be defined as B ( t )= a ( N / Y t ) 1−2 δ…”
Section: Frequentist Sequential Methods In Post‐licensure Safety Survmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming N is the maximum surveillance length in terms of expected number of cases, the stopping boundary, T , for the continuous MaxSPRT is T=min(T^,N), where T^=inft>0:ln(Λ)>=B(t), which is the time we reject H 0 . B ( t ) is a function of time t , which can be a time‐invariant flat constant proposed in the original MaxSPRT paper or a time‐varying boundary, which changes over time . For a group sequential method, the stopping boundary can be defined as B ( t )= a ( N / Y t ) 1−2 δ…”
Section: Frequentist Sequential Methods In Post‐licensure Safety Survmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, any of these methods could promote either concave or convex shapes by strategical usage of time-varying thresholds. For example, in the context of post-market safety surveillance, [14] generalizes MaxSPRT for Poisson data by considering the usage of non-flat critical values according to target Type I error probability spending. By comparing four different critical value functions in terms of statistical power and expected time to signal, they argue that, if an adverse event is rare but can lead to severe harmful consequences, then early rejection of H 0 should be permitted, that is, decreasing signaling thresholds should be preferred.…”
Section: Expected Time To Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods have been used to conduct safety studies with the VAERS database [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. In these methods, a contingency table is generally created to display counts for all vaccine and adverse event pairs during a specified time period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods have been used to conduct safety studies with the VAERS database. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] In these methods, a contingency table is generally created to display counts for all vaccine and AE pairs during a specified time period. In this table, each row represents a vaccine and each column represents an AE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%