1999
DOI: 10.1029/1999ja900308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous tracking of coronal outflows: Two kinds of coronal mass ejections

Abstract: The statistics improved during the 1980s as the SOLWIND (1979)(1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984)(1985) and SMM (1980,(1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989) However, there were relatively few systematic studies of acceleration. Despite its large 2.5-10 Rs field of view, the SOLWIND coronagraph had a low spatial resolution (-1.25 arc min) and revealed unambiguous accelerations for only a small number of particularly well observed events [Howard et 24,739

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
504
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 540 publications
(539 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
24
504
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Harrison et al, 2012). For more information on J-maps see Sheeley and Walters (1999) and Davies et al (2009).…”
Section: J-maps and Time-elongation Profile Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harrison et al, 2012). For more information on J-maps see Sheeley and Walters (1999) and Davies et al (2009).…”
Section: J-maps and Time-elongation Profile Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We empirically know, however, that CMEs associated with flares in active regions are also common (e.g., Munro et al [1979]). Based on the acceleration profiles and morphologies, there seem to be two types of CMEs [Sheeley et al, 1999], and it is likely that those which start fast and then decelerate correspond to flares more directly (cf., MacQueen and Fisher [1983]). Fast CMEs may produce interplanetary shocks that are considered to be responsible for major solar energetic particle (SEP) events observed near Earth IReames, 1999].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their distribution of CME speeds was very similar to that found by Hundhausen et al, (1994), with a peak near 300 km/s, and a long tail extending above 1500 km/s. However, Sheeley et al, (1999) used a differencing method to study the motion of CMEs, and, using a more limited sample, claimed that CMEs fell into two different types (see also MacQueen and Fisher, (1983), for a similar conclusion based on Mauna Loa observations). These were: gradual CMEs with a speed in the range 400 -600 km/s and apparently associated with prominence eruptions and secondly, fast CMEs with speeds in excess of 750 km/s, and associated with flares.…”
Section: Mass Velocity Acceleration and Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may seem to be an easier problem, but really it is not. One would expect fast CMEs to undergo prompt deceleration, yet that does not happen, at least inside 30 R s (Sheeley et al, 1999). So does this mean that CMEs are strongly driven to beyond 30 R s in order to overcome drag forces?…”
Section: Where Cme Research Standsmentioning
confidence: 99%