2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3499006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuously Updated Indirect Inference in Heteroskedastic Spatial Models

Abstract: Spatial units typically vary over many of their characteristics, introducing potential unobserved heterogeneity which invalidates commonly used homoskedasticity conditions. In the presence of unobserved heteroskedasticity, standard methods based on the (quasi-)likelihood function generally produce inconsistent estimates of both the spatial parameter and the coefficients of the exogenous regressors. A robust generalized method of moments estimator as well as a modified likelihood method have been proposed in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, Kyriacou et al (2017) started to consider this estimator for the spatial autoregressive (SAR) model. Then, Kyriacou et al (2019) and Bao et al (2020) extended this spatial econometric model with exogenous regressors and heteroskedastic errors. The paper by Bao and Liu (2021, this issue) further extends the latter model by also considering a spatial lag in the error term specification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, Kyriacou et al (2017) started to consider this estimator for the spatial autoregressive (SAR) model. Then, Kyriacou et al (2019) and Bao et al (2020) extended this spatial econometric model with exogenous regressors and heteroskedastic errors. The paper by Bao and Liu (2021, this issue) further extends the latter model by also considering a spatial lag in the error term specification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%