2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11440-018-0700-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuum hydrodynamics of dry granular flows employing multiplicative elastoplasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When considering a large deformation problem such as sand column collapse, an invariant stress tensor with respect to rigid-body rotation must be applied. Accordingly, the Green-Naghdi rate which gives an objective measure of the stress rate was adopted in this study (Green and Naghdi, 1964;Fávero Neto and Borja, 2018;Fávero Neto et al, 2020;Liang and Zhao, 2019;Jin et al, 2020;Systèmes, 2014): where Ω =Ṙ • R T , R is the rigid body rotation in the polar decomposition of the deformation gradient F . The differences between Green-Naghdi rate and Jaumann rate are significant only if finite rotation of a material point is accompanied by finite shear.…”
Section: Extension Of 3d-h Model At a Low Water Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When considering a large deformation problem such as sand column collapse, an invariant stress tensor with respect to rigid-body rotation must be applied. Accordingly, the Green-Naghdi rate which gives an objective measure of the stress rate was adopted in this study (Green and Naghdi, 1964;Fávero Neto and Borja, 2018;Fávero Neto et al, 2020;Liang and Zhao, 2019;Jin et al, 2020;Systèmes, 2014): where Ω =Ṙ • R T , R is the rigid body rotation in the polar decomposition of the deformation gradient F . The differences between Green-Naghdi rate and Jaumann rate are significant only if finite rotation of a material point is accompanied by finite shear.…”
Section: Extension Of 3d-h Model At a Low Water Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many possible solutions to simulate the granular column collapse by using numerical methods, e.g., the finite element method (FEM) using the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) technique (Crosta et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2019), the discrete element method (DEM) (Utili et al, 2015;Li et al, 2020), the particle finite element method (PFEM) (Zhang et al, 2015), the smoothing particle finite element method (SPFEM) (Jin et al, 2020), the material point method (MPM) (So lowski and Sloan, 2015), and the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method (Peng et al, 2015;Fávero Neto and Borja, 2018;Wang et al, 2019;Peng et al, 2019;Bui et al, 2008;Yin et al, 2018;Jin et al, 2019b,a). Furthermore, some multi-scale approaches have also been employed to simulate the granular column collapse problem, e.g., a hierarchical coupling scheme to integrate MPM with DEM packings for multi-scale modelling of large deformation in granular materials (Liang and Zhao, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other applications of RFEM in research include works studying the effects of soil spatial variability on the failure probability of slopes, 4–8 and the influences of spatially random undrained shear strength and stiffness on the displacement and safety factor of excavations 9–13 . In addition, reliability analysis of slope was examined in the current studies 14–18 and other finite element methods were investigated for slope stability analysis 19–21 . So far, these above studies have been limited to considering soil parameters as separated and independent random field structures, ignoring any cross‐correlations that may exist between different parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more diffuse responses, other methods are more appropriate, such as finite element method with Lagrangian Integration Points (FEMLIP) 25,26 . A host of meshfree methods, such as element‐free Galerkin, 27,28 smoothed‐particle hydrodynamics, 29–32 and the reproducing kernel particle method 33–35 have been developed explicitly for large‐deformation analysis and applied to problems in soil mechanics. In this paper, we use standard finite elements and leave the integration with numerical methods for very large deformations for future investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%