2018
DOI: 10.2140/apde.2018.11.499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuum limit and stochastic homogenization of discrete ferromagnetic thin films

Abstract: We study the discrete-to-continuum limit of ferromagnetic spin systems when the lattice spacing tends to zero. We assume that the atoms are part of a (maybe) non-periodic lattice close to a flat set in a lower dimensional space, typically a plate in three dimensions. Scaling the particle positions by a small parameter ε > 0 we perform a Γ-convergence analysis of properly rescaled interfacial-type energies. We show that, up to subsequences, the energies converge to a surface integral defined on partitions of th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…defining the X 0 y as indicated in this formula, and setting X m y := 0 for m ≥ 1, we immediately observe that the average F avg (a) is the sum of a family of random variables with multilevel local dependence structure with K := 1. The bound (26) follows immediately from the uniform bound on a (with B := ||a|| L ∞ and arbitrary γ > 0).…”
Section: The Multilevel Local Dependence Structure Of the Approximatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…defining the X 0 y as indicated in this formula, and setting X m y := 0 for m ≥ 1, we immediately observe that the average F avg (a) is the sum of a family of random variables with multilevel local dependence structure with K := 1. The bound (26) follows immediately from the uniform bound on a (with B := ||a|| L ∞ and arbitrary γ > 0).…”
Section: The Multilevel Local Dependence Structure Of the Approximatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While for static problems the above notions (i) and (ii) are often enough to prove stochastic homogenization results for variational models (see for example [2,3,12,15]), in this minimizing movement setting we make use of mixing properties. More precisely, we require that the random field is α-mixing with…”
Section: Notation and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our aim is to include dynamical effects in order to describe the curvature-driven motion of magnetic domain walls. The natural approach in the spirit of [3,12] would be to replace the periodic lattice in the definition of P ε by a stationary random lattice εL(ω) with suitable short-range interactions. This seems to be a very challenging problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, discrete counterparts of functionals (), that is, energies of the form 1εd+2i,jεLaij(uiuj)2,where scriptL is a d‐dimensional lattice, have been widely investigated (see, for example, [2, 11, 16, 34]) as a discrete approximation of quadratic integral functionals. Such type of functionals or the corresponding operators have been analysed in different ways under various inhomogeneity and randomness assumptions (see, for example, [3, 5, 13, 15, 23, 30, 32, 34]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work [3], discrete‐to‐continuous normalΓ‐limits are investigated for energies defined on random stationary lattices (for random thin‐film energies, see, for example, [13]). The energies admit both nearest neighbours and long distance interactions, it is assumed that the nearest‐neighbour terms satisfy p‐growth conditions and for the long distance terms proper moment conditions are fulfilled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%