Continuum modeling of park-and-ride services considering travel time reliability and heterogeneous commuters – A linear complementarity system approach

Du, Bo; Wang, David Z.W.

doi:10.1016/j.tre.2014.08.008

Cited by 73 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Further analysis should consider: (1) change of departure pattern under different transit subsidy policies, (2) non-linear body congestion (Huang, 2002;de Palma et al, 2015), (3) heterogeneous commuters Xiao and Zhang, 2014;Du and Wang, 2014;Wang and Du, 2016), (4) oligopoly transit operators (Liu et al, 2011), (5) three travel modes: auto-only mode, transit-only mode, and park-and-ride mode (Liu et al, 2009;Lu et al, 2015;Wang and Du, 2013), (6) congestion interactions between autos and buses Basso et al, 2011), (7) parking fees at the destination (Qian et al, , 2012Qian and Rajagopal, 2014). …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overcoming the Downs-Thomson Paradox by transit subsidy policies

Wang

Zhang

et al. 2017

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Consider a competitive highway/transit transportation system in which travelers either drive on the bottleneck-constrained highway or take scheduled trains from home to the workplace in the morning peak hours. This paper explores the impact of bottleneck capacity expansion on transit operating schemes (fleet size and fare) and travelers' departure time and mode choices. Due to the potential occurrence of the Downs-Thomson (D-T) Paradox after highway capacity expansion, the paper investigates whether the D-T Paradox can be circumvented by implementing transit subsidy policies. The effects of different transit subsidy schemes are explored: subsidizing the transit company (cost subsidy) or the passengers (passenger subsidy) with the financial support from either government funding or road pricing revenue. For each combination of subsidy method and financial sourcing, the condition for overcoming the D-T Paradox is established.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overcoming the Downs-Thomson Paradox by transit subsidy policies

Wang

Zhang

et al. 2017

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, we may further consider the routing behavior of certain specific CN players like Electric Vehicles (e.g., He et al 2014;Riemann et al, 2015;Kumar et al 2014). Finally, we will find the conditions for the existence of BP in time-dependent networks with dynamic traffic models Szeto, 2002a, 2002b;Szeto andLo, 2006, 2008;Du, 2013, 2016;Du and Wang, 2014).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Braess Paradox of traffic networks with mixed equilibrium behaviors

Wang

Sun

et al. 2016

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Re

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Therefore, researchers of the P&R scheme seek to find the most rational alternative that would maximize the potential benefit of P&R parking lots [8,9,10,11]. Scientists state that most drivers would use the services provided by the P&R scheme only in case if the ratio between the journey by public transport and by passenger car was significantly different.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%