Continuum-wise injective maps

Kato, Hisao; Matsuhashi, Eiichi

doi:10.1016/j.topol.2016.01.029

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The notion of continuum-wise injective maps was introduced in [5] for maps between compact spaces. Here we extend this definition for arbitrary spaces and arbitrary closed sets (not necessarily continua as in [5]): A map g : X → M is set-wise injective if for any two closed sets A, B ⊂ X with A = B, we have g(A) = g(B). We also consider the following specialization of that property: a map g : X → M is set-wise injective in dimension k (see also [5]) if g(A) = g(B) for any two closed sets A, B ⊂ X such that dim(A \ B) ≥ k. Obviously, every set-wise injective map in dimension 0 is injective.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The main results in this paper is the following theorem, which is a parametric version of Theorem 3.11 from [5] (recall that a map f :…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The main results in this paper is the following theorem, which is a parametric version of Theorem 3.11 from [5] (recall that a map f : X → Y is σ-perfect if X is a countable union of countably many closed sets X i such that each restriction f |X i : X i → f (X i ) is a perfect map): Theorem 1.1. Let f : X → Y be a σ-perfect surjective n-dimensional map between metric spaces such that dim Y ≤ m and M be a complete separable metric LC 2m+n−1 -space with the m-DD {n,k} -property with k ≤ n. Then the function space C(X, M) contains a dense G δ -set of maps g such that all restrictions g|f −1 (y), y ∈ Y , are set-wise injective in dimension n − k Corollary 1.2.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Parametric set-wise injective maps

Matsuhashi

Valov

2017

Topology and its Applications

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We introduce the notion of set-wise injective maps and provide results about fiber embeddings. Our results improve some previous results in this area. IntroductionAll spaces in the paper are assumed to be metrizable and all maps continuous. Unless stated otherwise, any function space C(X, M) is endowed with the source limitation topology. This topology, known also as the fine topology, was introduced in [17] and has a base at a given g ∈ C(X, M) consisting of the setswhere ̺ is a fixed compatible metric on M and ε : X → (0, 1] runs over continuous functions into (0, 1]. The symbol ̺(h, g) < ε means that ̺ h(x), g(x) < ε(x) for all x ∈ X. The source limitation topology doesn't depend on the metric ̺ [7] and has the Baire property provided M is completely metrizable [8]. Obviously, this topology coincides with the uniform convergence topology when X is compact.We say that a space M has the m-DD {n,k} -property if any two maps f : I m × I n → M, g : I m × I k → M can be approximated by maps f ′ : I m × I n → M and g ′ : I m × I k → M, respectively, such that f ′ ({z} × I n ) ∩ g ′ ({z} × I k ) = ∅ for all z ∈ I m . Obviously, if M has the m-DD {n,k} -property, then it also has the m ′ -DD {n ′ ,k ′ } -property for all m ′ ≤ m, n ′ ≤ n and k ′ ≤ k. The 0-DD {n,k} -property coincides with the well known disjoint (n, k)-cells property. The m-DD {n,k} -property is very similar to the m-DD {n,k} -property introduced in [1, Definition 5.1], where it is required for any open cover U of M the maps f, g to be approximated by maps f ′ , g ′ such that f ′ , g ′ are U-homotopic to f and g, respectively and f ′ ({z} × I n ) ∩ g ′ ({z} × I k ) = ∅ for all z ∈ I m . For example, it follows from [1, Proposition 5.6 and Theorem 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 54F15; Secondary 54F45, 54C10.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%