2014
DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2014.2346752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ConTour: Data-Driven Exploration of Multi-Relational Datasets for Drug Discovery

Abstract: Large scale data analysis is nowadays a crucial part of drug discovery. Biologists and chemists need to quickly explore and evaluate potentially effective yet safe compounds based on many datasets that are in relationship with each other. However, there is a lack of tools that support them in these processes. To remedy this, we developed ConTour, an interactive visual analytics technique that enables the exploration of these complex, multi-relational datasets. At its core ConTour lists all items of each datase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A prominent example is Semantic Substrates [SA06], Figure (a), which facet a network based on a categorical attribute and let analysts choose whether to show links between or within facets, or both. This approach is also commonly used in biological networks to visualize nodes within spatially segregated cell compartments [BMGK08], or to lay out k‐partite or multityped graphs [SJUS08, PLS*14, PvW08, GKL*13, ABF*07]. There are alternatives to faceting by sets or node types: Figure (b) shows faceting based on a hierarchical clustering algorithm where the clusters are laid out in a treemap [RMS*11] and nodes are shown within the treemap cells.…”
Section: Multivariate Network Visualization Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A prominent example is Semantic Substrates [SA06], Figure (a), which facet a network based on a categorical attribute and let analysts choose whether to show links between or within facets, or both. This approach is also commonly used in biological networks to visualize nodes within spatially segregated cell compartments [BMGK08], or to lay out k‐partite or multityped graphs [SJUS08, PLS*14, PvW08, GKL*13, ABF*07]. There are alternatives to faceting by sets or node types: Figure (b) shows faceting based on a hierarchical clustering algorithm where the clusters are laid out in a treemap [RMS*11] and nodes are shown within the treemap cells.…”
Section: Multivariate Network Visualization Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic Substrates [SA06, AS07], for example, place nodes according to other attribute values, whereas Cerebral [BMGK08] uses a layout optimized for topology. A series of other technique use a linear layout [PvW08, SJUS08, PLS*14], which is amenable to attribute visualization.…”
Section: Multivariate Network Visualization Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research efforts visualize datasets in separate views and then use linking and brushing techniques or explicit links to show data relations. ConTour [ 22 ] provides a relationship view of datasets, such as genes, compounds, and pathways, in columns at the bottom with a detailed view of the selected items above. The user selection of items in one column can highlight relevant items in other columns.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in the course of the analysis of the structure--activity relationships (SAR) in a series of closely related analogs, it is important to compare them not only by gross measures, but also by pairwise relations. The network and, more generally, graph analysis is widely used in computational and mathematical chemistry for a long time and was applied to numerous tasks, such as classification of chemical reactions [75], enumeration of small molecules [76], data organization [77], and QSAR model generation [78]. Drug discovery-related networks in the paradigm of network pharmacology [79] consider compound--target pairs (e.g., [80]) as well as target--target pairs (e.g., [81]); much less attention is paid to compound--compound relations [82].…”
Section: Graph-based Representations Of Chemical Spacementioning
confidence: 99%