2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78534-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contour Matching for Fish Species Recognition and Migration Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences of relative errors yield the following outcome ∆ ± σ∆ = 0.111 ± 0.034. Applying the same statistics like in the metal dataset for J = 240 and n2 = n1 = 175 (see equation (1)) one obtains the same correction factor C(240) ≈ 1.002. Again, setting the confidence level to α = 0.01 we can reject the null hypothesis that both distance measures perform equally well since t(240) ≈ 3.278 1.002 > 3 > T239 1 − α 2 ≈ 2.596 .…”
Section: Fish Datasetmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The differences of relative errors yield the following outcome ∆ ± σ∆ = 0.111 ± 0.034. Applying the same statistics like in the metal dataset for J = 240 and n2 = n1 = 175 (see equation (1)) one obtains the same correction factor C(240) ≈ 1.002. Again, setting the confidence level to α = 0.01 we can reject the null hypothesis that both distance measures perform equally well since t(240) ≈ 3.278 1.002 > 3 > T239 1 − α 2 ≈ 2.596 .…”
Section: Fish Datasetmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The parameter α1 ∈ [0, 1] can be interpreted as flexibility of the trend adjustment: Big values refer to a narrow window τ which causes localized offset removal and vice versa. 1 Please note, we do not claim that a windowed average cannot be calculated in constant time which is indeed possible with the help of prefix sums.…”
Section: Moving Average With Constant Memorymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A real challenge for this kind of application is the automatic discrimination of isolated fish in the image, ensuring that the object identified is a whole fish (hereinafter "goodfish") rather than a portion of it, or two or more overlapped fish (hereinafter "bad-fish") (Costa 2006 et al). The characterisation of a single fish is an essential processing step in the most significant applications of underwater video, such as fish detection, species identification (Spampiato et al, 2010) (Zion et al, 2007), biometric measurements (Tillett et al 2000) (Harvey et al 2003) (Costa et al 2006), biomass estimation in fish cages or tanks (Lines et al 2001) (Martinez et al 2003, tracking and counting fish (Lee et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%