1986
DOI: 10.2307/2947984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contraceptive Use and the Need for Family Planning in Puerto Rico

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Guttmacher Institute is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Family Planning Perspectives. SummaryIn 1982, 69 percent of Puerto Ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These issues resulted in a great clash between the mainstream women's movement and women advocates within communities of color. Women of color organized to protest the Public Health Service Sterilization Campaign of women in Puerto Rico and sterilization abuses by medical providers targeted to women of color throughout the United States (Aptheker, 1974;Herold, Warren, Smith, Rochat, Martinez, & Vera, 1986;Lopez, 1985;Rodriguez-Trias, 1984;Schenshul, Borrero, Barrera, Backstrand, & Guarnaccia, 1982;U.S. General Accounting Office, 1976;Warren, Westoff, Herold, Rochat, & Smith, 1986).…”
Section: Limitations Of Feminist Approaches To Sexualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These issues resulted in a great clash between the mainstream women's movement and women advocates within communities of color. Women of color organized to protest the Public Health Service Sterilization Campaign of women in Puerto Rico and sterilization abuses by medical providers targeted to women of color throughout the United States (Aptheker, 1974;Herold, Warren, Smith, Rochat, Martinez, & Vera, 1986;Lopez, 1985;Rodriguez-Trias, 1984;Schenshul, Borrero, Barrera, Backstrand, & Guarnaccia, 1982;U.S. General Accounting Office, 1976;Warren, Westoff, Herold, Rochat, & Smith, 1986).…”
Section: Limitations Of Feminist Approaches To Sexualitymentioning
confidence: 99%