2016
DOI: 10.1111/nup.12164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contract theories and partnership in health care. A philosophical inquiry to the philosophy of John Rawls and Seyla Benhabib

Abstract: Over the last 20 years, a paternalistic view in health care has been losing ground. The question about less asymmetrical positions in the healthcare professional-patient relationship is, for example, being addressed by the increased emphasis on person-centred care, promoted in disciplines such as medicine and nursing. Partnership is considered as a key component in person-centred care. Although the previous studies have addressed the attributes inherent in partnership, there is still potential for further disc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have examined studies that pay great attention to exploring different parties’ understanding of patient involvement (Arnetz & Zhdanova, ; Luttik et al., ; O'Brien et al., ; Rise et al., ; VIBIS, , ) and in developing methods and testing tools to facilitate patient involvement, such as decision aids (Wood, Phillips, Edwards, & Glyn, ), patient information (Grime & Dudley, ), guidelines (Miller & Rollnick, ), electronic health records (Milne et al., ) and smartphone applications (Lalloo, Jibb, Rivera, Agarwal, & Stinson, ). Also literature on evaluating patient involvement is growing (Gibson, Welsman, & Britten, ), just like philosophical (Määttä, Lützén, & Öresland, ) and critical perspectives (Handberg, Beedholm, Bregnballe, Nellemann, & Seibæk, ; O'Shea, Chambers, & Boaz, ) on the topic.…”
Section: Salient Features Of the Research Into Patient Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have examined studies that pay great attention to exploring different parties’ understanding of patient involvement (Arnetz & Zhdanova, ; Luttik et al., ; O'Brien et al., ; Rise et al., ; VIBIS, , ) and in developing methods and testing tools to facilitate patient involvement, such as decision aids (Wood, Phillips, Edwards, & Glyn, ), patient information (Grime & Dudley, ), guidelines (Miller & Rollnick, ), electronic health records (Milne et al., ) and smartphone applications (Lalloo, Jibb, Rivera, Agarwal, & Stinson, ). Also literature on evaluating patient involvement is growing (Gibson, Welsman, & Britten, ), just like philosophical (Määttä, Lützén, & Öresland, ) and critical perspectives (Handberg, Beedholm, Bregnballe, Nellemann, & Seibæk, ; O'Shea, Chambers, & Boaz, ) on the topic.…”
Section: Salient Features Of the Research Into Patient Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as persons without any life conditions, such as gender, which in various ways affect a person's life. 57,58 Second, to construct persons, as ‘diabetics’ is to view them as objects. Working relationships occur between people, not between objects or persons without life conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%