1980
DOI: 10.1063/1.438980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contracted Gaussian basis sets for molecular calculations. I. Second row atoms, Z=11–18

Abstract: Contracted Gaussian basis sets for molecular calculations are derived from uncontracted (12,8) and (12,9) sets for the neutral second row atoms, Z=11–18, and for the negative ions P−, S−, and Cl−. Calculations on Na...2p63p, 2P and Mg...2p63s3p, 3P are used to derive contracted Gaussian functions to describe the 3p orbital in these atoms, necessary in molecular applications. The derived basis sets range from minimal, through double-zeta, to the largest set which has a triple-zeta basis for the 3p orbital, doub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
4,720
1
30

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8,969 publications
(4,782 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
31
4,720
1
30
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of a suitable single crystal, we resorted to calculating the g-tensor and anisotropic spin-dipole couplings for 3a •+ using a suitable hybrid DFT functional and several basis sets both in vacuo and in a CH 2 Cl 2 solvent continuum. The g-values calculated with the all-electron basis set 6-311g(d,p) [31] (Table 3) are remarkably independent of the presence or absence of diffuse functions or solvent and are in excellent agreement with the experimental values. Furthermore, the calculated g-shifts relative to the free electron g-value allow unambiguous assignment of the experimental g-values as depicted in Figure 7b.…”
Section: F)supporting
confidence: 68%
“…In the absence of a suitable single crystal, we resorted to calculating the g-tensor and anisotropic spin-dipole couplings for 3a •+ using a suitable hybrid DFT functional and several basis sets both in vacuo and in a CH 2 Cl 2 solvent continuum. The g-values calculated with the all-electron basis set 6-311g(d,p) [31] (Table 3) are remarkably independent of the presence or absence of diffuse functions or solvent and are in excellent agreement with the experimental values. Furthermore, the calculated g-shifts relative to the free electron g-value allow unambiguous assignment of the experimental g-values as depicted in Figure 7b.…”
Section: F)supporting
confidence: 68%
“…Model (CPCM) [35][36][37][38][39] in conjunction with the united atom (UA) cavity-model in-tagged with Kohn-Sham (KS) radii (UAKS) [40][41] with water as a solvent ( = 78.39). We performed frequency calculations by determining analytically the second derivatives of the UB3LYP potential energy surfaces with respect to the fixed atomic nuclear coordinates to determine whether each of the minimized structures corresponded to an energy minimum or a saddle point.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the calculations were carried out using the B3LYP 18,19 functional and the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set. 20 A complete exploration of the potential energy surface E(φ,ψ) was performed by mapping the Ramachandran plot of Ac-Ac 6 c-NHMe. Calculations were performed on a grid of points on the (φ,ψ) space at 30° intervals, ω 1 and ω 2 being initially positioned at 180° in all cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%