SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016 2016
DOI: 10.1190/segam2016-13817394.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contraction preconditioner in finite-difference electromagnetic modeling

Abstract: This paper introduces a novel approach to constructing an effective preconditioner for finite-difference (FD) electromagnetic modeling in geophysical applications based on an FD contraction operator, similar to one developed for integral equation formulation of Maxwell's equation. The contraction properties of this operator were established using an FD analog of the energy equality for the anomalous electromagnetic field. We have also developed the formulas for an estimation of the condition number of the syst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, research into the 3‐D forward modelling of geophysical EM data has received more and more attention in the past decades, with significant work being done and effort expended to make it more accurate, efficient and applicable to real‐life situations (e.g. Mulder, 2006; Farquharson & Miensopust, 2011; Yavich & Zhdanov, 2016; Li et al ., 2020). The integral‐equation (IE), finite‐difference (FD), finite‐volume (FV) and finite‐element (FE) approaches are all commonly used for 3‐D forward modelling of geophysical EM data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, research into the 3‐D forward modelling of geophysical EM data has received more and more attention in the past decades, with significant work being done and effort expended to make it more accurate, efficient and applicable to real‐life situations (e.g. Mulder, 2006; Farquharson & Miensopust, 2011; Yavich & Zhdanov, 2016; Li et al ., 2020). The integral‐equation (IE), finite‐difference (FD), finite‐volume (FV) and finite‐element (FE) approaches are all commonly used for 3‐D forward modelling of geophysical EM data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%