2003
DOI: 10.1002/uog.60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contraction stress test versus ductus venosus Doppler evaluation for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in growth‐restricted fetuses with non‐reassuring non‐stress test

Abstract: Objective To compare Doppler evaluation of the ductus venosus and contraction stress test (CST) in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses with evidence of hemodynamic redistribution and a nonreactive non-stress test (NST). Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
19
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of GRIT study [6] and the findings that perinatal mortality increases from 12% in fetuses with AEDV/REDV in the UA to 39% when DV PIV is increased, it might seem reasonable to recommend delivery when the DV Doppler becomes abnormal, provided the fetus is considered viable [7,36,37,38]. Particularly reversal of the A-wave in DV results in exponentially increased risk for intrauterine fetal demise and there is a good body of evidence that delivery should be effectuated promptly [35,39,40,41]. In this study, experts suggested 28 weeks' gestational age to deliver, however again with wide uncertainty range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of GRIT study [6] and the findings that perinatal mortality increases from 12% in fetuses with AEDV/REDV in the UA to 39% when DV PIV is increased, it might seem reasonable to recommend delivery when the DV Doppler becomes abnormal, provided the fetus is considered viable [7,36,37,38]. Particularly reversal of the A-wave in DV results in exponentially increased risk for intrauterine fetal demise and there is a good body of evidence that delivery should be effectuated promptly [35,39,40,41]. In this study, experts suggested 28 weeks' gestational age to deliver, however again with wide uncertainty range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, one only abnormal CTG led to an emergency Cesarean section. Recently, the low value of an oxytocin challenge test when the venous Doppler is altered has also been demonstrated 28 . Nevertheless, some authors believe it more advisable in cases of FGR to use a combination of Doppler, CTG and biophysical profile to predict intrauterine compromise and fetal outcome in the face of timing delivery 29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Não foi identificada diferença significante entre os grupos no que diz respeito a hemorragia intraventricular (p=0,43), necessidade de surfactante (p=0,37), uso de respirador (p=0,23), disfunção miocárdica (p=0,22), enterocolite necrotizante (p=0,43) e permanência Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2006; 28(4): 238-43 pulsatilidade do DV é, também, fator indicativo para internação em UTI neonatal, pH arterial menor que 7,10 ao nascimento e morbidade neonatal 25 . No presente estudo, houve homogeneidade entre os dois grupos para IG ao nascimento e Apgar <7 no 5º minuto.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified