1991
DOI: 10.2307/2600983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contractual Design with Correlated Information under Limited Liability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LL constraints have both theoretical and practical appeal (e.g. Innes 1990;Demougin and Garvie 1991). On the practical side, LL constraints act as "payment floors" that prevent the processor from promising excessively low or negative payments in some states of the world.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LL constraints have both theoretical and practical appeal (e.g. Innes 1990;Demougin and Garvie 1991). On the practical side, LL constraints act as "payment floors" that prevent the processor from promising excessively low or negative payments in some states of the world.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, full surplus extraction critically relies on risk-neutrality or unlimited liability of buyers (Roberts, 1991, Demougin andGarvie, 1991) or on the absence of collusion by buyers (Laffont and Martimort, 2000). In principle, these concerns apply to a literal interpretation of my construction, too.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show that the first-best allocation cannot be implemented when the agent types are approximately independent, and either the monetary transfers amongst agents or their ex post payoffs have to satisfy a limited liability constraint. Demougin and Garvie (1991) study optimal regulation with a continuum of firm types, correlated information and non-negative limited liability constraints. Gary-Bobo and Spiegel (forthcoming) 3 study an optimal regulation problem with a continuous type space and finite signals, and assume the same conditions on costs and signals found in RS, but with the restriction that ex post payoffs of the agent are not allowed to fall below a certain level in every state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%