Southeast Asia 1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-19568-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contradictions in the Development of Malay Capital: State, Accumulation and Legitimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile in 1975, the government introduced the Industrial Coordination Act as a means to force Malaysian Chinese‐controlled firms to offer equity ownership to the Malays (Ali et al, ). By 1980, the government controlled institutional financing, as it owned 77.4% of the local banking industry (Hui, ). Therefore, the post‐1970 period witnessed the expansion of government bureaucracy and companies, resulting in excessive interference in the capital markets.…”
Section: Auditing Political Connections and Family Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile in 1975, the government introduced the Industrial Coordination Act as a means to force Malaysian Chinese‐controlled firms to offer equity ownership to the Malays (Ali et al, ). By 1980, the government controlled institutional financing, as it owned 77.4% of the local banking industry (Hui, ). Therefore, the post‐1970 period witnessed the expansion of government bureaucracy and companies, resulting in excessive interference in the capital markets.…”
Section: Auditing Political Connections and Family Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%