Contradictions of Reproduction of Human Capital in Modern Russia

Abstract

The article draws out the main contradictions in the reproduction of human capital from the point of view of the state of healthcare as the basis for the formation of biological human capital, education as a platform for the formation of intellectual capital, motivation for its development and preservation at the stages of the life cycle. The authors came to the conclusion that transformations and reforms in the social sphere, social protection of the population, employment, personnel management, training of bachelors, specialists and masters are accompanied by significant contradictions that impede the development of human capital. The main contradiction is observed between the health priorities at all stages of the life cycle due to its lasting value, regardless of the social differentiation of the population, quality vocational education and worsening conditions for its reproduction, especially in subsidized regions. The conclusions are based on the analysis of the main indicators of the state of health care, higher education, the authors' own research, and the generalization of specialists' opinions. The authors see the minimization of the negative consequences of this contradiction in the transition to a value-oriented healthcare model; creating favorable conditions for the training of specialists capable of active thinking, the formation of human and intellectual capital in accordance with the challenges of our time. Due to the fact that national projects were updated, we consider this tool for the formation and preservation of human capital. Keywords-human capital, stages of the life cycle of human capital, value-oriented healthcare system, higher education system, motivation to preserve workers' health, risks of "occupational burnout" of personnel, national projects.

The Essence and Role of the Labor Market Economy in the Context of Employment Provision in the Conditions of Economic Transformation

“…But the rapidly declining standard of living forced people to stay in their jobs, and the management of manufacturing enterprises were forced to prolong the agony of their own unprofitable and not fit into the market economy of the enterprise. But by the end of the last century, the crisis of production led to the outflow of workers into non-productive areas (Vasiltsova et al, 2018).…”

“…The second stage -1996-2000 -macroeconomic processes gained stability, there was a balance of production forces in the country, which allowed the government to control the inflation rate, the national currency gains stability, which will increase the level of industrial production, but mainly at the expense of extractive industries (Vasiltsova et al, 2018).…”

“…The adopted plan played a fundamental role in ensuring the formation of the labor market in the republic, Figure2. But the measures taken were aimed at reducing the problems of the market: an increase in government spending on stimulating employment (public works, training and retraining), at the expense of accumulated financial resources as a result of exporting the country's raw materials to world markets (Skvortsov et al, 2018).…”