2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/389013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contralateral Axillary Lymph Node Metastases at the Time of Primary Breast Cancer Diagnosis: Curative or Palliative Intent?

Abstract: Contralateral axillary lymph node metastases (CAMs) in breast cancer patients are uncommon. CAM can be found at the time of primary breast cancer diagnosis or following prior treatment of breast cancer as a recurrence. This distinction may have important implications for disease staging and treatment selection. We report the case of a premenopausal woman with synchronous CAM. Despite extensive multimodality treatment, a recurrence was found 27 months after primary surgery. We reviewed the literature on histopa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing this data to the patient presented in this case report, it is important to note that in both Morcos et al retrospective paper and Huston’s case series, nearly all patients had metachronous CAM. Zhou et al present a case of synchronous CAM with hormone receptor positive and HER-2 negative characteristics [4] . This suggests that there is a wide variability in histopathological findings with CAM, and that perhaps synchronous vs. metachronous CAM may represent different disease processes and different primary tumor aggressiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing this data to the patient presented in this case report, it is important to note that in both Morcos et al retrospective paper and Huston’s case series, nearly all patients had metachronous CAM. Zhou et al present a case of synchronous CAM with hormone receptor positive and HER-2 negative characteristics [4] . This suggests that there is a wide variability in histopathological findings with CAM, and that perhaps synchronous vs. metachronous CAM may represent different disease processes and different primary tumor aggressiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the survey performed by Bisase and Kerawala [25] in the UK in 2016 regarding the treatment of breast carcinoma neck metastases, 61% of the participants considered level V in the neck, as well as level III, as a disease that cannot be cured. In contrast, aggressive treatment with curative intent was proposed for contralateral axillary metastases [26][27][28][29]; also, fewer supraclavicular and neck metastases were detected with more aggressive primary surgical treatment [30]. As the study by Brito et al [31] and our data suggest, treatment of metastases limited only to the neck should be aggressive and include surgical therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Despite a lack of consensus, patients seek this type of treatment in the hope of being cured [23-28]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%