1987
DOI: 10.1080/01688638708405358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact

Abstract: There are serious methodological problems in studies which report contralateral visual masking. Contralateral masking occurs when detection of a hemifield target stimulus is impaired by a pattern-masking stimulus presented to the opposite hemifield. We demonstrate that, in studies which used positive stimuli (i.e., black letters on a white field), contralateral masking may be an artifact. Although we observed contralateral masking when positive stimuli were presented, there was no evidence of masking with nega… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, standardization of the following also seem to be desiderata for discerning consistency in results from different laboratories: (1) The types of masks, the effect of which varies with the degree of patterning, as Knight, Elliott, and Freedman (1985) have shown; (2) the procedure for establishing thresholds; (3) establishing (a) the length of the interstimulus interval, (b) the duration of the mask, (c) the visual angle for viewing the targets, and (d) whether contralateral masking was used (cf. Fein and Brown, in press).…”
Section: Backward Maskingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, standardization of the following also seem to be desiderata for discerning consistency in results from different laboratories: (1) The types of masks, the effect of which varies with the degree of patterning, as Knight, Elliott, and Freedman (1985) have shown; (2) the procedure for establishing thresholds; (3) establishing (a) the length of the interstimulus interval, (b) the duration of the mask, (c) the visual angle for viewing the targets, and (d) whether contralateral masking was used (cf. Fein and Brown, in press).…”
Section: Backward Maskingmentioning
confidence: 99%