1992
DOI: 10.1016/0023-9690(92)90023-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast and reinforcement in consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
5
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
30
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The possibility that exposure effects work against flavor-nutrient learning may explain why the results from Capaldi and Sheffer (1992) were different from those in the present Experiment 1. Capaldi and Sheffer's (1992) Experiment 2, in which flavor-nutrient learning was demonstrated with chocolate milk and saccharin, had no preexposure, 38 training days (19 exposures to the pairing of chocolate milk and saccharin Flavor 1 and 19 exposures to only saccharin Flavor 2) and 8 test days.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The possibility that exposure effects work against flavor-nutrient learning may explain why the results from Capaldi and Sheffer (1992) were different from those in the present Experiment 1. Capaldi and Sheffer's (1992) Experiment 2, in which flavor-nutrient learning was demonstrated with chocolate milk and saccharin, had no preexposure, 38 training days (19 exposures to the pairing of chocolate milk and saccharin Flavor 1 and 19 exposures to only saccharin Flavor 2) and 8 test days.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Preference was in the other direction for all the groups, except Group Chocolate. This is inconsistent with the results of Capaldi and Sheffer (1992). who found a preference for a flavor that followed chocolate milk over a flavor given alone; that is, flavor-nutrient learning.…”
Section: Fiayor2contrasting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations