onventional autopsy is a valuable tool, particularly for quality control in health care (1-3). Nevertheless, autopsy rates have been rapidly decreasing for various reasons, such as lack of interest of clinicians and next of kin due to overconfidence in premortem diagnostics, reluctance of family members to provide consent to autopsy because of the invasiveness of the procedure, reluctance of pathologists to perform autopsies, budgetary issues, and ideological opposition to postmortem investigation (4-11). Hence, noninvasive or minimally invasive alternative autopsy methods are being developed (12). The entire body can be visualized with postmortem CT and MRI (13-15), and imaging-guided biopsy can be performed to obtain tissue for histologic examination (16). In addition, CT angiography can be performed (17-23). Some of these methods are already used to support or even substitute for the forensic autopsy (24-26). In the clinical setting, noninvasive or minimally invasive autopsies of fetuses, newborns, and infants (27) have gained acceptance with parents and physicians along with political and public interest (28). However, they are still rarely applied in adult patients.