1989
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-198906000-00058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast Material-Induced Renal Failure in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus, Renal Insufficiency, or Both

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
350
4
21

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 290 publications
(377 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
350
4
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the definition used, CIN occurs in Ϸ1% to 15% of a general PCI population and in 20% to 40% of patients with preexisting RI. [27][28][29] The relatively low incidence of CIN in the present trial (4.6%) is probably related to the entry exclusion of patients with known severe RI, although CIN still developed in 9.7% of patients with mild to moderate baseline RI. The lack of routine daily creatinine measurements may also have led to an underestimation of the true incidence of CIN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Depending on the definition used, CIN occurs in Ϸ1% to 15% of a general PCI population and in 20% to 40% of patients with preexisting RI. [27][28][29] The relatively low incidence of CIN in the present trial (4.6%) is probably related to the entry exclusion of patients with known severe RI, although CIN still developed in 9.7% of patients with mild to moderate baseline RI. The lack of routine daily creatinine measurements may also have led to an underestimation of the true incidence of CIN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The most common definition used lately is 25% relative increase or an absolute increase of 0.5 mg/dL in serum creatinine from baseline value at 48 to 72 hr after exposure to contrast media. On the basis of this definition, the overall incidence of CIN in the general population is reported to be 1.2 to 1.6% [2,3]. The incidence of CIN is even higher in selected subsets of patients with cardiovascular pathology, which is not surprising given the high prevalence of risk factors for CIN in this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The incidence of CIN in diabetics varies from 5.7 to 29.4% [2,25,26]. Given the high prevalence of diabetes in the general population and its ability to cause broad spectrum of cardiovascular diseases, which require radiological procedures for their diagnosis and treatment, diabetic patients represent a significant proportion of those undergoing contrast exposure.…”
Section: Diabetes Mellitusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study of CIN in patients with diabetes, CKD, or both, the risk increased in patients with both diabetes and CKD, but did not increase in patients with diabetes, or patients with CKD [10]. In a metaanalysis of pooled individual patient data (n = 2,727) from 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which patients received either the iso-osmolar contrast media (iodixanol) or low-osmolar contrast media, the independent predictors of CIN included CKD, CKD plus diabetes, and the use of lowosmolar contrast media [11].…”
Section: Rationale Cq 2-1mentioning
confidence: 94%