1989
DOI: 10.1038/338137a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast mechanism for resolving organic molecules with tunnelling microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the STM image of a molecule it is therefore expected from this theory that the tunneling current distribution corresponds to maxima of the electron densities of the molecule. Alternatively it has been proposed by Spong et al that a modulation of the local work function of the substrate by insulating polarizable molecular adsorbates can explain the observed molecular images [23]. This mechanism would also require high electron densities at the maxima of the tunneling current.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For the STM image of a molecule it is therefore expected from this theory that the tunneling current distribution corresponds to maxima of the electron densities of the molecule. Alternatively it has been proposed by Spong et al that a modulation of the local work function of the substrate by insulating polarizable molecular adsorbates can explain the observed molecular images [23]. This mechanism would also require high electron densities at the maxima of the tunneling current.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore ordered organic monolayers on weak interacting substrates are ideal systems to study the image contrast in STM images of organic adsorbates. Several models have been proposed to explain the observed STM image contrast of molecules, but the underlying mechanisms are still under discussion [6][7][8]. The systematic study presented in this work allows us to discriminate between these different models and to develop a new approach based on the influence of a molecular pseudopotential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since specimens can be scanned under ambient conditions with low energies, these microscopes offer a (potentially) powerful means of examining functioning molecules with usual AFM operating conditions (12). Currently, the resolution of atomic structure is only routinely achieved with hard crystalline surfaces (1, 7) and organic adsorbates such as smectic liquid crystal monolayers (28,33). Subnanometer resolution of cellular surfaces has been difficult to achieve because of masking of atomic structure through the use of heavy metal contrasting agents and problems associated with the stabilization of the specimen during STM and AFM imaging (3,14,25,37,39).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%