1992
DOI: 10.1038/ki.1992.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast nephropathy in patients with impaired renal function: High versus low osmolar media

Abstract: Prescription of low osmolar contrast to prevent nephrotoxicity in subjects with pre-existing renal impairment is costly and has not been clearly shown to be effective. We entered 249 subjects with a pre-contrast serum creatinine greater than 120 mumol/liter (1.35 mg/dl) having cardiac catheterization or intravenous contrast into a randomized controlled trial comparing high and low osmolar contrast. The outcome assessed was a rise in serum creatinine repeated 48 to 72 hours after contrast. A further 117 patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
98
2
5

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
98
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, data from animal studies have suggested that nonionic CM is less nephrotoxic than ionic CM. [8][9][10][11][12] CN can be defined as an acute impairment of renal function following the exposure of radiocontrast medium. [1] The clinical presentation of CN is distinct, having a temporal relation between the performance of the contrast study in the high-risk patient and the onset of an increase in serum creatinine levels within the next 24 hours to 5 days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, data from animal studies have suggested that nonionic CM is less nephrotoxic than ionic CM. [8][9][10][11][12] CN can be defined as an acute impairment of renal function following the exposure of radiocontrast medium. [1] The clinical presentation of CN is distinct, having a temporal relation between the performance of the contrast study in the high-risk patient and the onset of an increase in serum creatinine levels within the next 24 hours to 5 days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, several pathophysiological mechanisms have been proposed, including disturbed renal perfusion/hypoxia, direct toxicity to renal tubular epithelium, apoptosis, altered glomerular function, and immunologic mechanisms. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Histamine is a well-known mediator of inflammation and a very important modulator of cytokine production. [23] Previous studies have reported on the elevation of plasma histamine levels after conventional CM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical factors that increase the risk for contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) include preexistent kidney disease, diabetes mellitus in the setting of underlying renal impairment, advanced congestive heart failure, intravascular volume depletion, administration of large volumes of contrast, and the use of high-osmolal contrast media (1,(5)(6)(7)(8). Much of our understanding of the risk factors for, incidence of, and outcomes associated with CIAKI emanate from clinical studies of patients undergoing angiography, particularly coronary angiography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rate is slightly higher than in similar studies of trauma patients, which reported a range of CIN rates from 1.9% to 6.6%. (11)(12)(13) We found that contrast volume, sCr at presentation, hypotension at presentation, and ISS were all risk factors for CIN in univariate analyses. In the multivariate analysis, only sCr at presentation and ISS remained independently associated with the development of CIN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…(10)(11)(12) Procedures that use intravascular contrast medium such as coronary angiography and contrast-enhanced CT are being used more frequently for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. In addition, the major risk factors for CIN, i.e., chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus, are also increasing in prevalence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%