2018
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting cadmium resistance strategies in two metallicolous populations of Arabidopsis halleri

Abstract: While cadmium (Cd) tolerance is a constitutive trait in the Arabidopsis halleri species, Cd accumulation is highly variable. Recent adaptation to anthropogenic metal stress has occurred independently within the genetic units of A. halleri and the evolution of different mechanisms involved in Cd tolerance and accumulation has been suggested. To gain a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying Cd tolerance and accumulation in A. halleri, ionomic inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
135
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
10
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the expression of KMT genes was analysed in the I16 and PL22 populations challenged with Cd. After 4 weeks of acclimatization in hydroponic growth medium, plants were treated with 5 μM CdSO 4 for 10 days and transcriptomic analysis was performed in root and shoot samples using RNA sequencing (Corso et al, ). Genes coding KMTs were retrieved from the RNAseq data and their expression was analysed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Then, the expression of KMT genes was analysed in the I16 and PL22 populations challenged with Cd. After 4 weeks of acclimatization in hydroponic growth medium, plants were treated with 5 μM CdSO 4 for 10 days and transcriptomic analysis was performed in root and shoot samples using RNA sequencing (Corso et al, ). Genes coding KMTs were retrieved from the RNAseq data and their expression was analysed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the treatment (Cd vs. CM) was less important, accounting for 34 and 19% of the variance in roots and shoots, respectively (Figure a). DEGs were then identified in two pairwise comparisons to estimate the effect of the genetic unit and the treatment ( p < .05, threshold set at 1.4‐fold change) (Corso et al, ). In agreement with the PCA, the PL22/I16 comparison identified 16 DEGs in roots and 10 DEGs in shoots (Figure b), whereas the Cd/control comparison yielded only four DEGs in PL22 and none in I16 (Figure c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations