2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting Diversity Patterns of Crenarchaeal, Bacterial and Fungal Soil Communities in an Alpine Landscape

Abstract: BackgroundThe advent of molecular techniques in microbial ecology has aroused interest in gaining an understanding about the spatial distribution of regional pools of soil microbes and the main drivers responsible of these spatial patterns. Here, we assessed the distribution of crenarcheal, bacterial and fungal communities in an alpine landscape displaying high turnover in plant species over short distances. Our aim is to determine the relative contribution of plant species composition, environmental condition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

20
101
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
20
101
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here the average habitat similarity and average bacterial community similarity were significantly and positively correlated at the scale of the circular neighbourhoods, which was in agreement with the environmental selection hypothesis 2,16,36 . Nevertheless, the initial similarities of habitat and soil bacterial community were weakly but negatively correlated, suggesting that variations in community composition occur at small scales, even in homogeneous habitats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Here the average habitat similarity and average bacterial community similarity were significantly and positively correlated at the scale of the circular neighbourhoods, which was in agreement with the environmental selection hypothesis 2,16,36 . Nevertheless, the initial similarities of habitat and soil bacterial community were weakly but negatively correlated, suggesting that variations in community composition occur at small scales, even in homogeneous habitats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, the natural dynamics of plant colonization along the salt marsh successional gradient is likely to modulate the belowground SOM, which is directly intertwined with shifts in soil fungal communities. The influence of SOM on soil fungal communities has been previously reported (Hartmann et al, 2009;Millard and Singh, 2010); not only the quantity but also the quality status and turnover rate of SOM were found to influence specific fungal populations along an ecosystem landscape (Zinger et al, 2011). Yet, in our study, it appeared that, at a local scale, the magnitude of the shifts in SOM quantity and quality did not exceed the effects imposed by the dominant vegetation, resulting in a lowered fungal turnover within sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…This trend was also found in a number of other soil-related mountain bacterial studies in the Colorado Rockies, Tibetan Plateau, the European Alps, and the Gorbeia Natural Park in Spain (2,5,8,10,15,16). Other environmental drivers of importance to grassland soil bacterial communities in mountain ecosystems include annual radiation, mean annual temperature, soil ammonium content, litter C:N ratio, snow depth, and plant diversity (2, 5-8, 10, 17).…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…In pioneering studies, King and coworkers (2) analyzed the bacterial habitat distribution along a mountain slope. Most authors have studied soil grassland bacterial diversity on a single or a few mountain transects, notably to emphasize the elevation factor in mountain ecosystems (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). However, alpine studies that span an important horizontal surface area, along with the vertical elevation gradient, are much fewer, despite that mountain ecosystems are composed of a large spectrum of different topographic, climatic, soil physical, and chemical conditions, interspersed with a wide range of microclimates occupied by varied vegetation and animal populations (2,(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%