Contrasting Impacts of Dams on the Metacommunity Structure of Fish and Macroinvertebrate Assemblages

Abstract

Impoundments are common features of many rivers that often impact abiotic conditions and the organisms that inhabit impacted reaches. As dams alter both local environmental conditions and the ability of organisms to move throughout the habitat, it is difficult to know which factors are driving changes in assemblage composition. To separate these effects, we employed a metacommunity approach to evaluate drivers of assemblage composition in fish and macroinvertebrate communities across two impoundments slated for removal in Danville, Illinois. Based on movement ability, we would expect dams to represent barriers to fish populations, whereas macroinvertebrates, with their motile adult phases, should be easily able to move across impoundments. Therefore, we would expect the assemblage structure of these two groups to be driven by different processes. We sampled habitat quality (measures) and both fish and macroinvertebrate communities in a replicated series of sites across two low‐head dams. As expected, the presence of dams resulted in reduced habitat quality as well as changes in fish and macroinvertebrate quality indices. However, fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages were driven by different metacommunity processes. Fish communities showed strong environmental filtering, responding to local environmental conditions, with no effect of distance between habitats. In marked contrast, macroinvertebrate communities were only related to physical distance between sites, with no indication of environmental filtering. These results suggest that when these dams are removed, fish assemblages should change with the removal of dam‐generated habitats. In contrast, dam removal may not alter macroinvertebrate composition, as it did not vary with habitat but appears driven by local dispersal.Received November 17, 2015; accepted July 17, 2016 Published online October 28, 2016

Response of benthic macroinvertebrates to dam removal in the restoration of the Boardman River, Michigan, USA

“…As a consequence of interrupted and slower flow rates, dams change proximate upstream areas from lotic to lentic environments [4]. Cumulatively, these changes affect stream ecosystems by altering fish and macroinvertebrate habitat and trophic relationships, thus affecting community composition [7][8][9].…”

Small hydropower dam alters the taxonomic composition of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in a neotropical river

“…Therefore, small dams have been the focus of construction projects in recent decades and can be found in most river systems in the world (Abbasi & Abbasi, ; Almeida, Oliveira, Mugnai, Nessimian, & Baptista, ). Studies characterizing the effects of small dams on lotic ecosystems are essential for improving management strategies and for predicting and mitigating ecological impacts (Hastings, Meiners, Colombo, & Thomas, ).…”

Low-Head Dam Removal Increases Functional Diversity of Stream Fish Assemblages

“…To date, more than 1,400 dams have been removed from U.S. waterways (American Rivers 2019), however, less than 10% of removals have been studied to understand their impacts on stream fishes (Bellmore et al 2017). Stream fishes are often particularly vulnerable to the ecological impacts imposed by dams (Oliveira et al 2018;Turgeonet al 2019;Barbarossa et al 2020), often resulting in significant shifts in community composition, such as an increase in homogenization of assemblages in streams with the higher spring flow (Hastings et al 2016). Such changes in fish communities may arise from many drivers, including fragmentation of populations, altered hydrology and flow regime, reduced lateral exchange of sediments and nutrients, and alteration of biological and physical characteristics of the river channel and flood plain (Bednarek 2001).…”