2021
DOI: 10.1017/s0305000920000720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting lexical biases in bilingual English–Mandarin speech: Verb-biased mothers, but noun-biased toddlers

Abstract: Is noun dominance in early lexical acquisition a widespread or a language-specific phenomenon? Thirty Singaporean bilingual English–Mandarin learning toddlers and their mothers were observed in a mother-child play interaction. For both English and Mandarin, toddlers’ speech and reported vocabulary contained more nouns than verbs across book reading and toy playing. In contrast, their mothers’ speech contained more verbs than nouns in both English and Mandarin but differed depending on the context of the intera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kauschke et al, 2007;Tardif et al, 1997) and to what extent (concrete) noun bias is a universal phenomenon or rather purely language specific is a topic of great debate (for review, see Waxman et al, 2013). Novel data (Setoh et al, 2021) suggests, however, that the early noun dominance is indeed a widespread phenomenon with cross-linguistic differences exerting only a minor effect. Assuming that priority of object words in early language acquisition is indeed a fundamental feature of human language learning, one reason for this priority of the concrete could lie in the teaching strategies of adults or the persistence of solid objects, which, in contrast to instances of abstract concepts, do not change in a fast, situation-dependent manner.…”
Section: Category Differences In Language Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kauschke et al, 2007;Tardif et al, 1997) and to what extent (concrete) noun bias is a universal phenomenon or rather purely language specific is a topic of great debate (for review, see Waxman et al, 2013). Novel data (Setoh et al, 2021) suggests, however, that the early noun dominance is indeed a widespread phenomenon with cross-linguistic differences exerting only a minor effect. Assuming that priority of object words in early language acquisition is indeed a fundamental feature of human language learning, one reason for this priority of the concrete could lie in the teaching strategies of adults or the persistence of solid objects, which, in contrast to instances of abstract concepts, do not change in a fast, situation-dependent manner.…”
Section: Category Differences In Language Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study has evaluated the verb to noun ratio of speech from parent-child interactions in a Singaporean bilingual population. Setoh et al (2021) found that most Singaporean Chinese mothers either used more verbs than nouns, or used similar number of verbs and nouns, in English and in Mandarin, thus suggesting that differences in the composition of parental input could be driving differences in the composition of their child's vocabulary. However, this finding falls short of explaining how Mandarin-English bilingual adults used more verbs in English than, say, Malaysian-English bilinguals adults in the first place.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first words children acquire vary by individual and reflect both the language the children are acquiring and the context in which that language is acquired. However, it appears to be consistent -at least across languages where this question has been studied in depth -that children generally acquire words for objects (nouns) before words for actions (verbs) (Gentner, 1982;Au et al, 1994;Caselli et al, 1995;Setoh et al, 2021).…”
Section: Referential Transparency Of Verbs In Child-directed Input By...mentioning
confidence: 99%