The Evolution of the Rheic Ocean: From Avalonian-Cadomian Active Margin to Alleghenian-Variscan Collision 2007
DOI: 10.1130/2007.2423(14)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting mantle sources and processes involved in a peri-Gondwanan terrane: A case study of pre-Variscan mafic intrusives from the autochthon of the Central Iberian Zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Annen et al (2005) proposed that fractional crystallization in shallow magma chambers and dehydration crustal melting are optimal settings for generating intermediate to silicic magmas in an arc. Together with the Al 2 O 3 versus TiO 2 diagram of Lopez‐Plaza et al (2007), this indicates that the granites followed a fractional crystallization trend and the monzodiorites followed a mantle‐fractionated trend (Figure 13e,f).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Annen et al (2005) proposed that fractional crystallization in shallow magma chambers and dehydration crustal melting are optimal settings for generating intermediate to silicic magmas in an arc. Together with the Al 2 O 3 versus TiO 2 diagram of Lopez‐Plaza et al (2007), this indicates that the granites followed a fractional crystallization trend and the monzodiorites followed a mantle‐fractionated trend (Figure 13e,f).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…(a) And (b) plots of ∫ Sm/Nd versus T DM1 ; (c) plot of ε Nd ( t ) versus T DM1 ; (d) plot of ε Nd ( t ) versus 87 Sr/ 86 Sr for samples from the Ghorveh area; (e) and (f) mantle partial melting and fractional crystallization trends in Al 2 O 3 versus TiO 2 diagram (after Lopez‐Plaza et al, 2007). Data for the Ebrahim‐Attar granites are from Azizi et al (2016), data for the Malayer granitoids are from Ahadnejad et al (2011), and data for the Ghorveh granite are from Azizi and Asahara (2013), Azizi et al (2011), and Azizi, Zanjefili‐Beiranvand, and Asahara (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial distribution of shear zones and folds indicates NE-SW maximum compression trajectories [63], not deviating significantly from the stress configuration characterizing the previous deformation phases. The D3 (315-306 Ma) [39,44,56] deformation phase took place mostly after the climax of crustal thickening, followed by decompression and HT-LP metamorphism during which large volumes of crustal melting were produced [39,55,[64][65][66][67][68]. Late-to post-D3 (300-270 Ma) [63,69], conjugate strike-slip fault systems running NNE-SSW (left-lateral) and NNW-SSE (right-lateral) were further generated in brittle conditions, locally reactivating syn-D3 (and syn-D1) shear zones (e.g., [37][38][39]45]).…”
Section: Meso-cenozoic Covermentioning
confidence: 99%