2024
DOI: 10.3389/fnimg.2024.1341732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting MEG effects of anodal and cathodal high-definition TDCS on sensorimotor activity during voluntary finger movements

Jed A. Meltzer,
Gayatri Sivaratnam,
Tiffany Deschamps
et al.

Abstract: IntroductionProtocols for noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are generally categorized as “excitatory” or “inhibitory” based on their ability to produce short-term modulation of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in peripheral muscles, when applied to motor cortex. Anodal and cathodal stimulation are widely considered excitatory and inhibitory, respectively, on this basis. However, it is poorly understood whether such polarity-dependent changes apply for neural signals generated during task performance, at rest,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 81 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?