2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting nutrient distributions during dry and rainy seasons in coastal waters of the southern Gulf of Mexico driven by the Grijalva-Usumacinta River discharges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
3
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, TN:TP in the Grijalva at Site 5 and in the Usumacinta at Site 7 only differ during the dry season, probably reflecting greater contribution of urban wastewater in the Grijalva during that period. Ratios calculated based on the combined nutrient loads of the Grijalva and Usumacinta at sites 5 and 7, respectively (Figure 6), were similar to those reported by Cardoso‐Mohedano et al (2022) for coastal areas adjacent to the Grijalva–Usumacinta mouth during the rainy season; however, our values for the dry season are lower and most likely driven by the greater contribution of low TN:TP water from the Grijalva River, in addition to decreased freshwater inputs into the ocean during that period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, TN:TP in the Grijalva at Site 5 and in the Usumacinta at Site 7 only differ during the dry season, probably reflecting greater contribution of urban wastewater in the Grijalva during that period. Ratios calculated based on the combined nutrient loads of the Grijalva and Usumacinta at sites 5 and 7, respectively (Figure 6), were similar to those reported by Cardoso‐Mohedano et al (2022) for coastal areas adjacent to the Grijalva–Usumacinta mouth during the rainy season; however, our values for the dry season are lower and most likely driven by the greater contribution of low TN:TP water from the Grijalva River, in addition to decreased freshwater inputs into the ocean during that period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…More disturbed rivers with greater TP concentrations like the Coatzacoalcos, Papaloapan, and Brazos (Figure 9) may represent important phosphorus sources for the Gulf of Mexico, after the Mississippi and Lower Atchafalaya (Table 4). Recent transport estimates for the Grijalva–Usumacinta are greater than our results, likely because they were based on nutrient measurements in coastal waters during the rainy season (Cardoso‐Mohedano et al, 2022). In addition, discharge at the Grijalva sites during the study period were lower than long‐term averages (Figure 3), suggesting that our results for the Grijalva River (Site 5) likely are underestimating the nutrient contribution of this river to the Gulf of Mexico.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations