2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2015.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting patterns of coupling between the CH stretches and the large-amplitude motions in the molecules, CH3NH2, CH3OH2+ and CH3CH2

Abstract: In each of the title molecules, torsional and inversion tunneling occurs between six equivalent minima. The coupling between these large-amplitude motions and the CH stretch vibrations stems from the variation of the CH stretching force constants as a function of the torsional and inversion coordinates. First principles 2dimensional maps of the variation of the CH-stretch force constants are reported.Although the torsional barriers differ by more than a factor of 20, the torsioninversion-vibration coupling is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, now that we appreciate that JT2 is larger than JT1 along the MEP and that geometric phase is +1, but the torsional tunneling splittings remain inverted [24,28,29]. Likewise the JT2 terms are dominant in a series of G 12 molecules including methylamine and the ethyl radical [48], and in those systems the torsional tunneling patterns are also inverted [49,50]. The fact of inverted tunneling splittings can be derived from symmetry considerations [39,49], but there is evidently no direct connection with geometric phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, now that we appreciate that JT2 is larger than JT1 along the MEP and that geometric phase is +1, but the torsional tunneling splittings remain inverted [24,28,29]. Likewise the JT2 terms are dominant in a series of G 12 molecules including methylamine and the ethyl radical [48], and in those systems the torsional tunneling patterns are also inverted [49,50]. The fact of inverted tunneling splittings can be derived from symmetry considerations [39,49], but there is evidently no direct connection with geometric phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%