“…In fact, genetic variation in Scottish populations seems to be slightly higher than in mainland populations (y sil ¼ 0.011 vs 0.009, respectively) and relative to previous estimates for the species (y sil ¼ 0.005 at 16 loci with some related to timing of bud set and y sil ¼ 0.0089 at 14 cold-tolerance candidate loci (Wachowiak et al, 2009)). Compared with estimates in other forest tree species, overall diversity in Scottish populations (p tot ¼ 0.0078) is only lower than that in broadleaved Populus tremula (0.0111, Ingvarsson, 2005) and is higher than that in Q. crispula, (0.0069, Quang et al, 2008), Q. petraea (0.0062, Derory et al, 2009), P. pinaster (0.0055, Eveno et al, 2008, P. taeda (0.0040, Brown et al, 2004), Picea abies (0.0039, Heuertz et al, 2006) and other conifers . The diversity estimate for Scottish populations is compatible with the patterns of genetic variation observed in previous studies (monoterpenes Forrest, 1980;Forrest, 1982), allozymes Kinloch et al, 1986), chloroplast DNA microsatellite markers Provan et al, 1998).…”